How much does genetics add to screening? Breast cancer risk stratification using genetic and non-genetic risk assessment tools for 246,142 women in the UK Biobank.

Author:

Li Jingmei1,Ho Peh Joo1ORCID,Lim Elaine2,Hartman Mikael3,Wong Fuh Yong2

Affiliation:

1. Genome Institute of Singapore

2. National Cancer Centre Singapore

3. National University of Singapore

Abstract

Abstract Background The topic of whether genetic screening for cancer risk should be implemented is complex. Using UK Biobank data, we 1) computed optimal risk thresholds for the detection of breast cancer, 2) examined the overlap of high-risk individuals identified by different risk predictors, and 3) evaluated the performance of risk predictor combinations. Patients and methods We studied 246,142 women without breast cancer at study entry. Risk predictors assessed include: the Gail model (GAIL), family history of breast cancer (FH, binary), 313-SNP breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS), and carriership of loss-of-function variants in at least one of the 9 breast cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51D, RAD51C, and TP53) (LoF). Absolute risk for developing invasive breast cancer was computed. Youden J-index was used to select optimal thresholds for defining high-risk. Results In total, 147,399 were considered at high risk for development of breast cancer within the next two years by at least one of the four breast cancer risk assessment tools examined (Gail2 − year>0.5%: 47%, PRS2 − year>0.7%: 30%, FH: 6%, and LoF: 1%); 92,851 (38%) were flagged by only one risk predictor. Seventy-nine percent of the breast cancers that did develop within the next two years were from the high-risk group. When compared to a random sample, the biggest gain in proportion of breast cancer cases was found within women at PRS high-risk, followed by GAIL, FH and LoF. The best-performing combinatorial model comprises a union of high-risk women identified by PRS, FH, and LoF (AUC2 − year [95% CI]: 62.2 [60.8 to 63.6]). Assigning individual weights to each risk prediction tool appeared to increase the discriminatory ability. Conclusion Our findings suggest that risk-based breast cancer screening may require a multi-pronged approach that includes PRS, breast cancer predisposition genes, family history, and other recognized risk factors.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3