Multi-purpose biorefineries and their social impacts: A systematic literature review

Author:

Santos Dayvid Souza1ORCID,Ianda Tito Francisco2,de Carvalho Priscila Pereira Suzart2,de Camargo Pedro Luiz Teixeira3,Santos Fárlei Cosme Gomes dos4,Alzate Carlos Ariel Cardona5,Pessoa Fernando Luiz Pellegrini6,Kalid Ricardo de Araújo7

Affiliation:

1. Federal University of Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia

2. UFBA: Universidade Federal da Bahia

3. Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Minas Gerais - Machado Campus: Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas Gerais - Campus Machado

4. UESC: Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz

5. UNAL Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

6. SENAI CIMATEC Technology College: Faculdade de Tecnologia SENAI CIMATEC

7. UFSB: Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia

Abstract

Abstract Multi-product biorefineries are very promising industries to diversify the economy of countries since they have a productive matrix with a biological characteristic capable of processing various types of biomass with applications in pharmaceutical, renewable energy, and other industries. In this context, this research carries out an analysis of the literature on biorefineries and the methods of assessing social impacts that consider quality of life, employment, and stakeholders, among other metrics, as guided by the United Nations – UN. A systematic review combined with bibliometric, semantic, and content analysis was carried out by searching scientific documents in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. A total of 116 articles were located, of which twenty-three were selected by three researchers to compose the research. The Fleiss Kappa Index was applied to verify the agreement of the evaluators' decision regarding the inclusion and exclusion of articles, they obtained K = 0.43 above the tolerable limit defined for the inclusion of articles, which is K ≥ 0.21Therefore, all twenty-three articles were included. The results indicate that most biorefinery projects consider optimization and econometric methods and especially the employment metric, therefore, understood as insufficient for assessing social impacts. On the other hand, projects whose methods consider Social Life Cycle and Multicriteria are more consistent for assessing the social impacts of biorefineries, as they allow an analysis of qualitative and significant information.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3