Deltoid tuberosity index obtained by computed tomography versus radiography for measuring bone quality in proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective observational study

Author:

Labronici Pedro José1,Pereira Lucas Fávero2,Cabral Guilherme Guimarães2,Magalhães Gabriela Sulz2,Belangero William Dias3,Pires Robinson Esteves4,Silva Gustavo Waldolato4,Dyer George S. M.5,Giordano Vincenzo6

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal Fluminense

2. Hospital Santa Teresa

3. Universidade Estadual de Campinas

4. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

5. Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School

6. Hospital Miguel Couto

Abstract

Abstract Background In cases of proximal humeral fractures, fracture severity and the patient’s osteoporotic condition should be assessed to achieve the best possible treatment outcomes. The Tingart measurement is commonly used to assess bone quality, but it can be problematic if the measurement area is affected by the fracture. Recently, the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) has been developed as another index to evaluate bone quality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the DTI obtained by X-ray imaging with computed tomography (CT) in assessing bone quality for proximal humeral fractures. Methods Fifteen patients with proximal humeral fractures were included, and the images were assessed twice by two independent evaluators with an interval of 1 month between each assessment. According to DTI values measured by X-ray, values greater than 1.4 were considered positive for osteoporosis, while values less than or equal to 1.4 were considered negative. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years old with a proximal humeral fracture who underwent anteroposterior radiography and CT. Pathological fractures, pre-existing humeral fractures, and metabolic diseases were excluded. Results There was good agreement between the CT and X-ray measurements. However, there were significant differences between them, with the CT measure being higher than the X-ray measure in 46.7% of the evaluations. The best cut-off points for diagnosing osteoporosis were found to be the same for CT and DTI: 1.4. CT diagnosis had an accuracy of 73.3%, a sensitivity of 65.2%, and a specificity of 78.4% when compared to X-ray diagnosis. False-positive diagnoses were 14.3%, and false-negative diagnoses were 13.3%. Conclusions CT can be considered a good method for diagnosing osteoporosis in proximal humeral fractures. The findings of this study allow the surgeon to use the CT as a new tool to make the diagnosis of osteoporosis and to define the patient under risk for surgical procedure.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3