Psychometric properties of questionnaire scales to assess psychosocial determinants that influence compliance with surgical site infection prevention measures: results of the WACH-study

Author:

Krosta Karolin M.E.1,Tomsic Ivonne1,Maike Stolz2,Krauth Christian2,Chaberny Iris F.3,von Lengerke Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Hannover Medical School, Centre of Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology

2. Hannover Medical School, Centre of Public Health and Healthcare, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research

3. Leipzig University Hospital, Centre for Infection Medicine, Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Psychosocial determinants influence healthcare workers’ compliance with infection prevention and control measures. In order to design needs-based interventions promoting compliance, such determinants must first be assessed using valid and reliable questionnaire scales. To compare professional groups without bias, the scales must also be measurement-equivalent. This study examines these psychometric properties of four questionnaire scales that assess determinants influencing compliance with surgical site infection (SSI) prevention measures. Exploratively, associations with self-reported compliance are reported. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Nine general/visceral or orthopedic/trauma surgery departments in six non-university hospitals in Germany. Participants: N=90 physicians and N=193 nurses (response rate: 31.5%). Methods: A written questionnaire was used to assess the compliance with SSI prevention measures and the determinants of compliance based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior-Model. For psychometric testing, single- and multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses were performed, and t-tests and multiple linear regressions for explorative analyses. Results: The scales assessing individual determinants of compliance (capability, motivation, planning) were found to be reliable (Cronbach’s αs≥.85) and valid (Root-Mean-Square-Error of Approximation=.065, Comparative-Fit-Index=.95) and revealed measurement equivalence for physicians and nurses. The scale assessing external determinants (opportunity) did not demonstrate validity, reliability, or measurement equivalence. Group differences were found neither in compliance (p=.627) nor determinants (p=.129; p=.866; p=.964). Capability (β=.301) and planning (β=.201) showed theory-conform associations with compliance for nurses only. Conclusions: The scales assessing motivation, capability, and planning regarding SSI prevention compliance provided reliable and valid scores for physicians and nurses in surgery. Measurementequivalence allows group comparisons of scale means to be interpreted without bias.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference56 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

2. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care;Erasmus V;Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2010

3. Hand hygiene compliance in the ICU: A systematic review;Lambe KA;Crit Care Med,2019

4. Hand hygiene compliance by direct observation in physicians and nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Bredin D;J Hosp Infect,2022

5. Compliance with hand disinfection in the surgical area of an orthopedic university clinic: Results of an observational study;Baier C;Antimicrob Resist Infect Control,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3