Postgraduate medical education in obstetrics & gynecology in Switzerland in comparison to Germany and Austria, results of an international survey

Author:

Krischer Benedict1,Brechbühl-Litzel Ruth1,Breuer Georg-Daniel2,Favero Martine3,Foessleitner Philipp4,Friemann Margareta5,Weiss Martin6,Windsperger Karin4,Winder Franziska7

Affiliation:

1. Luzerner Kantonsspital

2. Universitätsklinikum Tulln

3. Private practice

4. Medical University of Vienna

5. Municipal Clinical Center Lüneburg

6. Eberhard Karls University

7. Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Abstract

Abstract

Background There is frequent academic exchange between Switzerland, Germany and Austria, facilitated by the common language. Also the postgraduate training curricula in obstetrics & gynecology show some similarities. We aimed to compare self-perceived level of ability, availability of simulation training and teaching and feedback culture among residents in obstetrics & gynecology in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. The focus was on Switzerland, to gain better understanding of strengths and room for improvement. Methods In a cross sectional design, a web-based survey with 30 questions was distributed under obstetrics & gynecology residents in the three countries in August and September 2020. Primary outcome was the self-perception of skills in between-countries-comparison in mid-training trainees, i.e. omitting trainees in their first year as well as very advanced trainees and specialists. Secondary outcome was reported teaching, simulation training and feedback culture. German and Austrian responses were calculated together and compared with the Swiss replies. Results 422 participants took part in the survey, with 27.5% (n=116) from Switzerland, corresponding to a questionnaire response rate of around 19%. 48% of Swiss trainees were in training years 2-5. 57% of Swiss participants felt confident in obstetric procedures and 69% in gynecological procedures - compared to 52% and 68% in non-Swiss (p=0.005 and p=0.176). Swiss participants felt significantly more confident in performing gynecological than obstetric procedures (p=0.015). 63 % of Swiss participants had obstetric and 28% had gynecological simulation training compared to 37% and 17% in Germany and Austria, respectively (p<0.001 and p=0.007). 56% of Swiss participants reported “enough structured teaching”, 43% reported a “good teaching culture”, 47% of Swiss participants stated to receive regular feedback. Conclusions The majority of trainees in Switzerland feel confident in a range of procedures and interventions. Simulation training is relatively widespread, although especially surgical simulation training should be expanded. Clinical teaching and feedback culture should be strengthened. “Teach the teacher” courses should be encouraged to promote a sustainable feedback culture.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. 1. Hostettler S, Kraft E. FMH Ärztestatistik 2019. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung. 2020;101(13):450–5.

2. 2. Hurd WW, Barhan SM, Rogers RE. Obstetrician-gynecologist as primary care provider. Am J Manag Care. 2001 Sep 25;7 Spec No:SP19-24.

3. 3. FMH. Weiterbildungsprogramm Facharzt für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe [Training Program Outlines for OBGYN] [Internet]. FMH Facharzttitel. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.fmh.ch/files/pdf17/gynaekologie_version_internet_d1.pdf

4. 4. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Ärztinnen-/Ärzte- Ausbildungsordnung 2015. Wien; 2015 p. 1–34.

5. 5. Bundesärztekammer. Weiterbildungsordnung 2018. Berlin; 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3