Affiliation:
1. Ifakara Health Institute
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Biological control is a promising alternative or complementary approach for controlling vector populations in response to the spread of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. This study evaluated the efficacy of three selected potential predators on the density and fitness parameters of Anopheles funestus larvae in rural Tanzania.
Methods
Common predator families (Aeshnidae, Coenagriondae, and Notonectidae) and An. funestus group larvae were collected from natural aquatic habitats in rural south-eastern Tanzania. Predators were starved for 12hours while An. funestus larvae were given fish food before starting the experiment. Anopheles funestus larvae were placed into artificial habitats containing predators, exposing them to potential predation. The number of surviving An. funestus larvae was counted every 24hours. An emergence trap was placed at the top of artificial habitats to capture emerging mosquitoes. Emerged mosquitoes were monitored until they died. Female wings were measured and used as a proxy for body size. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with binomial variates at 95% CI and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the proportion of dead mosquitoes and the daily survival determined.
Results
There were significant differences in the number of emerged mosquitoes between the treatment and control groups (p < 0.001). Thus, all predator species played a significant role in reducing the density of An. funestus mosquitoes (P < 0.001). Furthermore, these predators had notable effects on the fitness parameters and survival of emerged mosquitoes (P < 0.001). Among the three predators studied, Coenagrionidae were most efficient followed by Notonectidae, with Aeshnidae being the least efficient.
Conclusion
Selected aquatic predators have the potential to reduce the survival and density of Anopheles funestus larvae. They might eventually be included within an integrated malaria vector control strategy, ultimately leading to a reduction in malaria transmission.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Prevention Efforts for Malaria;Tizifa TA;Curr Trop Med Reports,2018
2. WHO. World Malaria report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization. ; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
3. Long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying may not be sufficient to eliminate malaria in a low malaria incidence area: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia;Loha E;Malar J,2019
4. WHO. Malaria fact sheet. Geneva. ; 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets.
5. Bio-control of anopheles mosquito larvae using invertebrate predators to support human health programs in Ethiopia;Eba K;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021