Item-response theoretical examinations of a lot of bullshit: Evaluations of measures of bullshit production and reception

Author:

Blötner Christian1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. FernUniversität in Hagen

Abstract

Abstract Scholars developed and probed measures of individual receptivity to and production of ambiguous, empty, or otherwise deceptive information that is intended to gain advantages or avoid disadvantages (so-called bullshit). All recent endeavors to scale development and evaluation were limited to classical test theory, but no study has yet applied item response theory (IRT). In a sample of 525 participants, most of the items of the Bullshit Receptivity Scale, the Scientific Bullshit Receptivity Scale, and the Bullshitting Frequency Scale revealed appropriate IRT properties in the polytomous graded response model. However, in some cases, sufficient information could be obtained only within relatively narrow spectra, or gaps of obtainable information occurred along the spectra. Furthermore, bullshit and real information statements did not function equally well. Last, statistical concerns with frequently employed bullshit sensitivity scores were discussed and recommendations for further efforts concerning item development were expressed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3