The OptiBreech Care Pathway: evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1) – a mixed methods implementation feasibility study

Author:

Walker Shawn1ORCID,Spillane Emma2,Stringer Kate3,Meadowcroft Amy4,Dasgupta Tisha1,Davies Siân1,Sandall Jane1,Shennan Andrew1,Collaborative OptiBreech1

Affiliation:

1. King's College London

2. Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

3. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

4. Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Background OptiBreech Care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term, including where chosen, physiological breech birth attended by professionals with advanced training and/or proficiency. We aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing OptiBreech team care to test it in trial-within-a-cohort study. Methods Our design was a mixed methods trial feasibility assessment across England and Wales, January 2021 – June 2022. Our objectives were to determine whether Trusts could provide attendants with advanced training (implementation feasibility), who deliver protocol-consistent care (fidelity), in a way acceptable to women and staff (acceptability), within existing resources (costs), while maintaining low neonatal admission rates (safety) and adequate recruitment rates (trial feasibility). Participants were women > 37 weeks pregnant with a breech-presenting fetus, requesting support for a vaginal breech birth following standard counselling, and the staff involved in the study. No randomisation occurred in this first stage of feasibility work. Results Thirteen National Health Service sites recruited. A total of 82 women planned births on the study, and 21 staff were interviewed. Sites with a breech specialist midwife and/or dedicated clinic recruited 1 woman/month, while sites without recruited an average of 2 women every 3 months. Referrals into the study came from midwives (46%), obstetricians (34%) and women themselves (20%). Vaginal births were attended by staff with OptiBreech training at 87.5% (35/40) and by staff who met stricter proficiency criteria at 67.5% (27/40). Fidelity criteria were met more consistently by staff who met proficiency criteria. There were four neonatal admissions (4.9%, 4/82), including one serious adverse outcome (1.2%, 1/82); these outcomes compare well with previous breech research. Women found the model of care highly acceptable compared to standard care, and staff providing care generally found the OptiBreech model acceptable. However, staffing shortages throughout the pandemic and persistent negative views of vaginal breech birth outside the teams created challenges. Conclusions A large prospective observational cohort of OptiBreech Care, which could potentially support nested or cluster randomisation, appears feasible in sites willing to establish a dedicated clinic and develop further proficient members of staff strategically, with back-up plans for supporting rapidly progressing births. Randomisation procedures remain to be feasibility-tested. Funded by the NIHR (300582).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Impey L, Murphy D, Griffiths M, Penna L. on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. BJOG [Internet]. 2017 Jun;124(7):e151–77. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1471-0528.14465.

2. NHS Digital. Maternity Statistics NHS. 2018–2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 17]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2018-19.

3. Lafitte AS, Dolley P, le Coutour X, Benoist G, Prime L, Thibon P, et al. Rate of caesarean sections according to the Robson classification: Analysis in a French perinatal network – Interest and limitations of the French medico-administrative data (PMSI). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2018 Feb 1 [cited 2019 Jan 8];47(2):39–44. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784717302519?via%3Dihub.

4. NICE. Caesarean Section. NICE Clinical guideline. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; 2011.

5. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2015 Jan [cited 2016 Aug 18];(4):CD000083. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828903.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3