Recruitment-To-Inflation Ratio to Assess the Impact of Peep on Dynamic Lung Strain

Author:

Murgolo Francesco1,Grieco Domenico Luca2,Spadaro Savino3,Bartolomeo Nicola4,Mussi Rossella Di1,Crovace Antonio5,Lacitignola Luca5,Staffieri Francesco5,Grasso Salvatore1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Precision-Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area (DiMePRe-J), Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.

2. Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency. Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS. Rome, Italy

3. Department of Translational Medicine, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ferrara, Italy.

4. Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.

5. Department of Precision-Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area (DiMePRe-J), Section of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.

Abstract

Abstract Background: In ARDS, the beneficial effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) are proportional to the extent of dynamic lung strain reduction. This depends on the variable recruitment produced by PEEP. Current quantification of alveolar recruitment and PEEP-induced changes in dynamic lung strain relies on computed tomography (CT), which lacks bedside accessibility. The recruitment to-inflation ratio (R/I) is a bedside-available tool proposed to assess recruitability. We performed an experimental study on an animal model of ARDS to establish whether R/I accurately reflects the impact of PEEP on dynamic lung strain assessed through CT. Methods: Fourteen anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs with ARDS (lipopolysaccharide infusion) underwent CT-scans, respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and ventilatory ratio assessment at PEEPLOW (5 cmH2O) and PEEPHIGH (PEEP adjusted to reach a plateau airway pressure of 28-30 cmH2O). CT-scans were analyzed to quantify recruitability (potential for lung recruitment in terms of tissue recruitment) and PEEP-induced dynamic lung strain reduction. R/I was calculated through a one-breath derecruitment maneuver between the two PEEP experimental conditions. Results: Median R/I was 1.08 [0.88-1.82]. At PEEPHIGH, dynamic lung strain decreased form 0.59 [0.46 - 0.80] to 0.37 [0.29-0.44]: however, the extent of PEEP-induced dynamic strain reduction due to PEEP was highly inter-individually variable, with a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) 69%. The entity of PEEP-induced reduction in dynamic lung strain exhibited a strong correlation with R/I (R2=0.87; p< 0.0001), while it was independent from changes in oxygenation (R2<0.01, p=0.97) and ventilatory ratio (R2<0.01, p>0.99). No correlation was found between R/I and potential for lung tissue recruitment assessed by CT-scan (R2=0.08; p=0.34). Conclusions: PEEP-induced changes in lung dynamic strain are inter-individually variable. R/I, despite not reflecting the extent of potential for lung tissue recruitment, allows to estimate the amount of PEEP-induced reduction in dynamic lung strain at bedside, proving its useful for setting PEEP to minimize the harmful effects of PEEP during mechanical ventilation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. The adult respiratory distress syndrome. Clinical features, factors influencing prognosis and principles of management;Petty TL;Chest,1971

2. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on alveolar recruitment and gas exchange in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome;Ranieri VM;Am Rev Respir Dis,1991

3. Ventilator-induced lung injury;Slutsky AS;N Engl J Med,2013

4. Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury;Muscedere JG;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1994

5. Lung inhomogeneity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome;Cressoni M;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3