Emerging Technique: Stag Beetle Knife for Zenker's Diverticulum - A Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy

Author:

Bhatia Mannat K1,Ogwor Oghenfejiro1,Doukas Panagiotis G1,Bhatia Mehar K2,Doukas Sotirios1,Mohan Babu P.3,Broder Arkady1

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Saint Peter’s University Hospital

2. Government Medical College

3. Orlando Gastroenterology PA

Abstract

Abstract Background and aim: The SB Knife, a unique scissor-shaped device with rotating insulated monopolar blades, is increasingly employed in the endoscopic management of ZD, and this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate its overall safety, efficacy, and feasibility. Methods A thorough search of electronic databases and conference abstracts was conducted until November 2023. Meta-analysis utilized the random-effects model, with I2% assessing heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was based on sample size, employing SMD and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous variables. Key outcomes included clinical success, recurrence rate, adverse events, and improvement in dysphagia score. Results Incorporating eight studies with 299 patients (60.5% males), mean age 72.75 ± 2.86 years, and ZD size 2.66 ± 0.52 cm, procedures lasted 23.06 ± 10.00 minutes. Clinical success was achieved in 86% (95% CI: [81–90; I2 0%]) after 10.98 sessions and 22.74% required multiple (up to 4) sessions. The recurrence rate was 15% [11–20; I2 0%]. Intraprocedural complications occurred in 9% [5–13; I2 = 29%], primarily minor bleeding (9.6%), micro-perforation (2%), odynophagia (1.3%), and fever (1.05%). Late-onset bleeding occurred in 3.2% after 1 week. Adverse events were conservatively managed, and subgroup analysis by sample size indicated a significant difference in mean sessions (p = 0.02). Dysphagia score improvement was SMD (95% CI) 1.59 [2.27–0.91; I2 97%], p < 0.01, with a mean 22.23 ± 11.47 months follow-up. Conclusion The meta-analysis confirms SB knife's success in ZD, displaying excellent safety and dysphagia improvement; however, further research is needed to define optimal patient cohorts and compare them with other management techniques.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Ishaq S;Gastrointestinal endoscopy,2016

2. The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Zhang H;Surgical Endoscopy,2022

3. Endoscopic needle-knife treatment for symptomatic esophageal Zenker's diverticulum: A meta‐analysis and systematic review;Li LY;Journal of Digestive Diseases,2018

4. Flexible Endoscopic Versus Rigid Endoscopy or Surgery for the Management of Zenker's Diverticulum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Aguirre DPC;Cureus,2023

5. Adverse events after rigid and flexible endoscopic repair of Zenker's diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Crawley B;Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3