Affiliation:
1. Queen Mary University of London
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Growing evidence suggests that healthcare financing is one of the key factors for the attainment of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Social Health Insurance (SHI) has recently earned global recognition as a possible financing mechanism to enable affordable and equitable healthcare services in resource-scarce settings. However, the path to establishing such schemes is known to be ridden with structural and political contextual challenges.
Methods
This work aimed to identify the enabling factors for the implementation of SHI as a financing tool for UHC in LMICs, using Kenya's National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) experience as a case study. We used health policy lenses to analyse how actors' behaviours interplayed with other dimensions of policymaking to shape the development of Kenya’s NHIF and interpret their perceptions of policy outcomes. Drawing from 21 semi-structured interviews and an analysis of published and grey literature, we gathered qualitative as well as quantitative evidence to perform a retrospective case analysis of the NHIF experience in Kenya.
Results
One of our key findings is that only 17% of Kenya’s population are covered by SHI. Despite the predominance of the informal labour market in Kenya (83%), only 27% are covered by the NHIF, implying very low uptake and/or retention rates. There was little stakeholder engagement in the policy implementation process and minimum adoption of expert advice. Health financing policies were heavily influenced by political affiliations and positions of power. In addition, the purchasing and payment of healthcare was flawed, with inefficiencies including slow bureaucratic reimbursement procedures, little knowhow by rural hospital clerks, misappropriation, and a preference for private healthcare providers. The group-based parallel schemes run alongside the national scheme and the penalty payments for defaulted premiums increased the equity gap of the NHIF’s benefits for Kenya’s population.
Conclusion
Although the SHI system was perceived to increase the coverage and quality of Kenya’s health services, substantial structural and contextual challenges appear to have hindered its potential to finance the attainment of UHC, which should be a stepping-stone towards comprehensive healthcare attainment. Based on Kenya’s experience, we identify informal sector participation, efficiency of purchasing and payment of healthcare, and political engagement as key bottlenecks for the implementation of SHI schemes in LMICs.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. WHO. Health financing [Internet]. WHO. 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-financing.
2. World Health Organization. The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage [Internet]. World Health Organization. ; 2010. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44371.
3. Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy;Kutzin J;Bull World Health Organ,2013
4. The ORIGINS of Primary Health Care and SELECTIVE Primary Health Care;Cueto M;Am J Public Health,2004
5. Hsiao WC, Shaw RP. Social Health Insurance for Developing Nations [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6860.