Examining the Latent Structure and Correlates of Sensory Reactivity in Autism: A Multi-site Integrative Data Analysis by the Autism Sensory Research Consortium

Author:

Williams Zachary J.1,Schaaf Roseann2,Ausderau Karla K.3,Baranek Grace T.4,Barrett D. Jonah5,Cascio Carissa J.6,Dumont Rachel L.2,Eyoh Ekomobong E.7,Failla Michelle D.8,Feldman Jacob I.6,Foss-Feig Jennifer H.9,Green Heather L.10,Green Shulamite A.11,He Jason L.12,Kaplan-Kahn Elizabeth A.13,Keçeli-Kaysılı Bahar6,MacLennan Keren14,Mailloux Zoe2,Marco Elysa J.15,Mash Lisa E.16,McKernan Elizabeth P.13,Molholm Sophie17,Mostofsky Stewart H.18,Puts Nicolaas A. J.12,Robertson Caroline E.19,Russo Natalie13,Shea Nicole13,Sideris John4,Sutcliffe James S.5,Tavassoli Teresa14,Wallace Mark T.5,Wodka Ericka L.18,Woynaroski Tiffany G.6

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

2. Thomas Jefferson University

3. University of Wisconsin–Madison

4. University of Southern California

5. Vanderbilt University

6. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

7. University of Minnesota

8. The Ohio State University

9. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

10. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

11. University of California, Los Angeles

12. King's College London

13. Syracuse University

14. University of Reading

15. Cortica Healthcare

16. Baylor College of Medicine

17. Albert Einstein College of Medicine

18. Kennedy Krieger Institute

19. Dartmouth College

Abstract

Abstract Background Differences in responding to sensory stimuli, including sensory hyperreactivity (HYPER), hyporeactivity (HYPO), and sensory seeking (SEEK) have been observed in autistic individuals across sensory modalities, but few studies have examined the structure of these “supra-modal” traits in the autistic population. Methods Leveraging a combined sample of 3,868 autistic youth drawn from 12 distinct data sources (ages 3–18 years and representing the full range of cognitive ability), the current study used modern psychometric and meta-analytic techniques to interrogate the latent structure and correlates of caregiver-reported HYPER, HYPO, and SEEK within and across sensory modalities. Bifactor statistical indices were used to both evaluate the strength of a “general response pattern” factor for each supra-modal construct and determine the added value of “modality-specific response pattern” scores (e.g., Visual HYPER). Bayesian random-effects integrative data analysis models were used to examine the clinical and demographic correlates of all interpretable HYPER, HYPO and SEEK (sub)constructs. Results All modality-specific HYPER subconstructs could be reliably and validly measured, whereas certain modality-specific HYPO and SEEK subconstructs were psychometrically inadequate when measured using existing items. Bifactor analyses unambiguously supported the validity of a supra-modal HYPER construct (ωH = .800), whereas a coherent supra-modal HYPO construct was not supported (ωH = .611), and supra-modal SEEK models suggested a more limited version of the construct that excluded some sensory modalities (ωH = .799; 4/7 modalities). Within each sensory construct, modality-specific subscales demonstrated substantial added value beyond the supra-modal score. Meta-analytic correlations varied by construct, although sensory features tended to correlate most strongly with other domains of core autism features and co-occurring psychiatric symptoms. Certain subconstructs within the HYPO and SEEK domains were also associated with lower adaptive behavior scores. Limitations: Conclusions may not be generalizable beyond the specific pool of items used in the current study, which was limited to parent-report of observable behaviors and excluded multisensory items that reflect many “real-world” sensory experiences. Conclusion Psychometric issues may limit the degree to which some measures of supra-modal HYPO/SEEK can be interpreted. Depending on the research question at hand, modality-specific response pattern scores may represent a valid alternative method of characterizing sensory reactivity in autism.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3