Explaining biological differences between men and women by gendered mechanisms

Author:

Colineaux Hélène1,Neufcourt Lola1,Delpierre Cyrille1,Kelly-Irving Michelle1,Lepage Benoit2

Affiliation:

1. EQUITY Team, CERPOP, INSERM

2. Epidemiology department, Teaching Hospital, Toulouse III University

Abstract

Abstract Background. The principal aim of this study was to explore if biological differences between men and women can be explained by gendered mechanisms. Methods. We used data from the 1958 National Child Development Study, including all the living subjects of the cohort at the outcome collection wave (44-45 years). We explored several biomarkers as outcomes: systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HbA1c, CRP, and cortisol. Three conceptualizations of gender have been used to define methodological strategies: (a) Gender as an individual characteristic; (b) Gender as an effect of birth sex on socio-behavioural characteristics; (c) Gender as an interaction between birth sex and the social environment, here the early-life social environment. We estimated the total effect of sex and the proportion of total effect of birth sex eliminated by gender, measured by 3 different ways according to these 3 concepts, using g-computation. Results. The average level of each biomarker was significantly different according to birth sex, higher in men for cardiometabolic biomarkers and higher in women for inflammatory and neuroendocrine biomarkers. The sizes of the differences were always smaller than one standard deviation but were larger than differences due to early-life deprivation, except for CRP. We observed gender mechanisms underlying these differences between men and women, even if the mediation effects were rarely statistically significant. These mechanisms were of three kinds: (1) mediation by socio-behavioural characteristics; (2) attenuation by gendered mechanisms; (3) interaction with early social environment. Indeed, we observed that being born into a deprived rather than non-deprived family increased metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers levels more strongly in females than in males. Conclusions. The biological differences between men and women seem to not be purely explained by biological mechanisms. The exploration of gender mechanisms opens new perspectives, in terms of methodology, understanding and potential applications.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference61 articles.

1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Can Inst Health Res n.d. https://www.cihr-irsc-igh-isfh.ca/ (accessed March 1, 2022).

2. Sex Differences and Gender Diversity in Stress Responses and Allostatic Load Among Workers and LGBT People;Juster R-P;Curr Psychiatry Rep,2019

3. The association between allostatic load and cognitive function: A systematic and meta-analytic review;D’Amico D;Psychoneuroendocrinology,2020

4. Does the choice of Allostatic Load scoring algorithm matter for predicting age-related health;McLoughlin S;outcomes? Psychoneuroendocrinology,2020

5. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art;Hammarström A;J Epidemiol Community Health,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3