The BEACON Study: An update to the protocol for a cohort study as part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of smartphone-assisted problem-solving therapy in men who present with intentional self-harm to emergency departments in Ontario

Author:

Hatcher Simon1ORCID,Heisel Marnin J2,Ayonrinde Oydeji3,Corsi Daniel4,Edgar Nicole E1,Kennedy Sidney H5,Rizvi Sakina J5,Schaffer Ayal6,Sinyor Mark7

Affiliation:

1. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

2. Western University

3. Queen's University

4. University of Ottawa

5. St Michael's Hospital

6. University of Toronto

7. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundMen who present to the emergency department (ED) with self-harm are at high risk of dying by suicide, with 2.7% of men dying in the year following their presentation, more than double the rate for women (1.2%). Despite this, care received after an ED visit is highly variable and many are not assessed for psychological needs. Furthermore, the limited psychological care that is available is often not covered by provincial health insurance. Even when referrals for follow-up care are made, engagement rates are low. Previous recommendations to improve engagement include written discharge plans, caring contacts, and focused interventions targeting middle-aged men at elevated risk of dying by suicide. Blended care, the incorporation of technology into traditional care, has also been proposed as a method to increase engagement in and clinical benefits from psychotherapy. This project aims to determine whether the delivery of an evidence based treatment (Problem Solving Therapy - PST) iss enhanced by the addition of a custom smartphone application (BEACON) compared to usual care. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site participation and the planned implementation, we have made several changes to the study design, primary outcome and implementation.MethodWe originally proposed a cohort study nested within a larger cluster randomized trial wherein intervention sites would deliver the blended care, and control sites, whose personnel were not aware of their participation, would continue delivering usual care. The cohort study evaluated participant level outcomes as previously described by Hatcher et al (2020). Due to pandemic related constraints, our number of participating sites dropped to five potential sites which left the cohort study underpowered. As such, we changed the study design to a multi-site, individual randomized controlled trial (RCT) among the five remaining sites. Participants will be randomized to six sessions of therapy (PST) alone, or to the therapy plus BEACON, and followed up for 6 months. Our primary outcome was changed to evaluate feasibility and acceptability with the aim of designing a definitive RCT. Study implementation was reimagined to allow for completely virtual/online conduct to comply with local COVID-19 and institutional restrictions on in-person activities.ConclusionThis updated protocol will provide strong results for the planning of a definitive RCT of the blended care intervention in the future, addressing areas of difficulty and concern prior to its implementation. We will evaluate the feasibility of the study intervention, assess recruitment and retention of participants, and address challenges with implementing the protocol. Lastly, we will evaluate the appropriateness of our primary outcome measure and accurately determine a sample size for a definitive RCT.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03473535. Registered on March 22, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03473535.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference9 articles.

1. The BEACON study: protocol for a cohort study as part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of smartphone-assisted problem-solving therapy in men who present with intentional self-harm to emergency departments in Ontario;Hatcher S;Trials,2020

2. Cochrane-Brink KA, Phil D, Lofchy JS, Sakinofsky I, Psych FRC. Clinical rating scales in suicide risk assessment [Internet]. 2000. Available from: https://journals-scholarsportal-info.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/pdf/01638343/v22i0006/445_crsisra.xml.

3. Beck A, Steer R. Manual for the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1991.

4. Psychometric characteristics of the scale for suicide with psychiatric outpatients;Beck AT;Behav Res Ther,1997

5. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how. Vol. 10: BMC Medical Research Methodology; 2010.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3