Making good decisions is hard when you are at your worst: Investigating the degree of users’ decision-making in an e-Mental health service

Author:

Bartali V.1,Brandl L.2,Karreman J.2,Velsen L. van1

Affiliation:

1. Roessingh Research and Development

2. University of Twente

Abstract

Abstract Background. Empowering people to decide on their health has proven to be beneficial and to enable the creation of a therapeutic alliance. This could be the same in an e-Mental health service. However, little is known about the degree of decision-making people should have when using such services and when they are seriously depressed or in a life-threatening situation. Method. The topic was explored through two studies. The first study was a quantitative study to investigate how much decision-making freedom the self-help e-Mental health service allowed and in what situation (serious or less serious mental complaints) the service could be used. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four prototypes of a self-help e-Mental health service (for elderly people) with a different degree of decision-making and level of gravity of the situation. Afterwards, they were asked to fill in a survey to measure autonomy, competence, relatedness, privacy, safety, patient-technology alliance and intention to use. To analyse the data, ANOVAs and regression analyses were performed. In a second, qualitative study, 10 (clinical) experts with different backgrounds were interviewed about the degree of decision-making elderly people should have when using an e-Mental health service. The interviews were analysed via open and axial coding. Results. For the first study, 72 elderly people were recruited. No significant effect of decision-making and level of gravity was found. Relatedness significantly influences patient-technology alliance and intention to use. Additionally, patient-technology alliance significantly influences intention to use. For the second study, it was found that control is central for users, even if it is more difficult for people who are seriously depressed or in a critical situation. Nonetheless, design and technical suggestions on how to support users of e-Mental health services who have more serious symptoms are presented, including personalization, a three-steps approach to control, and setting goals. Conclusions. The results of this study can be applied to other self-help e-Mental health services with therapeutic purposes. Additionally, further research is needed to understand which other factors, together with relatedness, can influence the creation of a therapeutic alliance and how to foster intention to use.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference78 articles.

1. Akeel, A. U., & Mundy, D. (2019). Re-thinking technology and its growing role in enabling

2. patient empowerment. Health Informatics Journal, 25(4), 1278–1289. Doi: 10.1177/1460458217751013

3. Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of

4. artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548

5. Atlas.ti (n.d). Retrieved on 2021, June 16 from ATLAS.ti: The Qualitative Data Analysis & Research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3