Affiliation:
1. University of Chieti-Pescara
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Today dental implants represent an effective therapy in case of partial or total edentulism, with an excellent success rate. Despite the results obtained, there may be biological or mechanical complications during the therapy, which lead to the loss of the implant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of the art in the literature on techniques used for the removal of dental implants. Various aspects will be analyzed, such as the success of the technique, any complications, and the advantages and disadvantages of their use.
Methods
Two reviewers conducted a literature analysis (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) of the last 20 years (2003–2023). The main criterion analyzed was the success of the technique, while secondary outcomes such as complications and risks of the technique were also analyzed. 258 articles were identified in the various search databases. 42 eligible articles were subsequently identified after an article screening. Only 18 full texts were subsequently included in the review.
Results
A total of 18 articles were selected and 1142 implants and 595 patients were included. The main techniques used were the Counter-Torque Ratchet Technique (CTRT), Piezosurgery, trephine drills, carbide burs, Erbium, Chromium, Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Garnett (Er:Cr:YSGG) laser and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. Combined uses of techniques have been identified such as: Piezosurgery and trephine burs or carbide burs, trephine burs with the use of a 3d-printed-guide, CTRT and trephine burs. The technique with the highest success rate, less morbidity for the patient, and less removal of bone appears to be the CTRT.
Conclusions
The use of conservative techniques, especially CTRT, in bone removal is useful to allow for immediate implant placement in the removal area. However, further studies with a high sample size are needed to be performed on all techniques, particularly new RCTs that allow for the analysis of the success of alternative techniques such as Laser and Piezosurgery, which appear to be very promising.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Klinge B, Flemming T, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Eisner BM, Hultin M et al. The patient undergoing implant therapy. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26.
2. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses;Goodacre CJ;J Prosthet Dent,2003
3. An update;Dental endosseous implants;J Am Dent Assoc,2004
4. Biological factors contributing;Esposito M;Eur J Oral Sci,1998
5. Dental implants: Maintenance, care and treatment of peri-implant infection;Chen S;Aust Dent J,2003