Prolonged versus intermittent vancomycin infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Miyoshi Yukari1,Kawauchi Akira2,Kano Ken-ichi3,Kubo Kenji4,Egi Moritoki5,Kondo Yutaka1

Affiliation:

1. Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital

2. Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital

3. Fukui Prefectural Hospital

4. Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center

5. Kyoto University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Vancomycin is often used empirically as a first-line drug for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapy in patients with sepsis. This review aimed to clarify the clinical efficacy and safety of prolonged vancomycin infusion compared to intermittent infusion in adult patients with acute severe infection. Methods Potentially eligible trials were identified by searching the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI) online databases. We selected randomized controlled trials and observational studies in which the clinical outcomes of adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were compared between prolonged and intermittent vancomycin infusion strategies. Two investigators independently screened the search results and extracted data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the maximum follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the attainment of the target plasma concentration, clinical cure, and adverse events, such as nephrotoxicity. Results Sixteen studies were identified for the analysis of baseline characteristics. A total of 214 patients from three randomized trials and 1999 patients from 13 observational studies were included. Mortality rates of patients receiving prolonged infusion and patients receiving intermittent infusion were similar (pooled risk ratios, 1.05; 95% confidence intervals, 0.63–1.74; P = 0.85 in randomized controlled trials and pooled risk ratios, 1.07; 95% confidence intervals, 0.74–1.55; P = 0.71 in observational studies). Patients treated with prolonged infusion had a significantly higher attainment of the target plasma concentration compared with patients receiving intermittent infusion (pooled risk ratios, 5.62; 95% confidence intervals, 2.09–15.07; P < 0.001 in randomized controlled trials and pooled risk ratios, 2.27; 95% confidence intervals, 1.393.71; P = 0.001 in observational studies). No significant difference was detected in the other outcomes. Conclusions Our findings revealed that, compared with intermittent administration, prolonged infusion of vancomycin may be advantageous for controlling blood vancomycin levels.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3