Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Miao Yuxin1,Wang Xiaoyu1,Li Zongxiao1,Zhang Xiaoxu1,Niu Zejun1

Affiliation:

1. The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different anesthesia techniques, PENG block and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), in managing pain and minimizing side effects for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Due to increasing numbers of patients with comorbidities, anesthesia for hip fractures has become a significant challenge. Methods From the initiation of the study until April 26, 2022, a comprehensive search was conducted across several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang Data, to identify relevant studies. The focus of the search was randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy of PENG block and FICB in hip fracture surgery. To ensure the validity of the study, two independent reviewers applied the standards of the Cochrane systematic review to evaluate and index all the papers. In case of heterogeneity between studies, a random-effects model was utilized, and a fixed-effects model was employed otherwise. Results According to the combined data, PENG block can decrease 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (P༜0.05), but its 48-hour postoperative opioid consumption is not significantly different from control group (CI [-12.27, 2.79], P = 0.22). There are also no differences in side effects (CI [0.13,4.57], P = 0.76) and dynamic or static pain scores (P༞0.05) . Conclusions The results of the meta-analysis indicate that PENG blocks are effective in reducing opioid consumption for 24 hours post-hip fracture surgery. This implies that PENG blocks may be a promising alternative for reducing pain and minimizing the risk of substance abuse in patients. However, to establish this with certainty, more research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up in the form of prospective randomized controlled trials is necessary.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3