“I’m not a graduate or doctor, yet we are all together:” Articulating a partnership model for community-engaged research

Author:

Draanen Jenna1,Perlmutter David L.1,Banos Jazmin Higuera1,Goh Brenda1,Wettemann Courteney1,Williams Grover Will1,Holland Nathan1,Rourke Rachel1,Pitcher Rob1,Fockele Callan Elswick1,Park Avery1,Teadt Sierra1,Oliphant-Wells Thea2,Frohe Tessa1

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington

2. Public Health – Seattle & King County

Abstract

Abstract

Background Research With Expert Advisors on Drug Use (READU) is a community-engaged research collaborative of people with lived and living experience, clinicians, and academic researchers. We sought to evaluate the challenges and rewards of the partnership model. Methods Using the Peer Engagement Process Evaluation framework, the READU team collaborated on generating a list of focus group topics. All (n = 8) active team members participated in a focus group. Thematic analysis was used to identify key ideas. Results Five main themes were identified. “Collaborative Research Model” relates to the importance of a shared set of values, power dynamics, and the importance of centering community in research. “Group Dynamics” describes occasionally getting side-tracked in the work, as well as closeness among team members. “Individual Growth and Skill Development” concerns personal and intellectual development, as well as the benefits and opportunities for bi-directional training. “Institutional Structure”, encompasses the logistics of a hybrid working model and compensation issues. “Moving Forward and Future Work” involves the process of ending a research project in a positive way and envisioning future opportunities. Conclusion READU’s partnership model is generally positive and mutually beneficial for all team members. All partners feel a sense of satisfaction and closeness, and that the relevance and impact of research is enhanced. Although some challenges have been identified, particularly related to compensation and the physical workplace, these are not intractable. The evaluation of this partnership should motivate researchers considering partnership with community-based researchers, and highlight practical considerations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3