Tackling social disconnection: An umbrella review of RCT-based interventions targeting social isolation and loneliness

Author:

Hansen Thomas1ORCID,Nes Ragnhild Bang1,Hynek Kamila1,Nilsen Thomas S.1,Reneflot Anne1,Stene-Larsen Kim1,Tornes Ragnhild1,Bidonde Julia1

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Abstract

Abstract Background Social isolation and loneliness are urgent public health concerns associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes. Understanding effective remedies is crucial in addressing these problems. Objectives To synthesize and critically appraise scientific evidence on the effectiveness of social isolation and loneliness interventions overall and across subgroups. We focused on systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched seven databases (June 2022 and updated June 2023) and supplemented the search with grey literature and reference screening to identify SRs published since 2017. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR2 tool were conducted independently by author pairs, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Findings: We included 29 SRs, 16 with meta-analysis and 13 with narrative synthesis. All SRs focused on loneliness, with 12 additionally examining social isolation. Four SRs focused on young people, 11 on all ages, and 14 on older adults. The most frequently examined intervention types were social (social contact, social support), psychological (therapy, psychoeducation, social skills training), and digital (e.g., computer use and online support). Meta-analyses indicated small-to-moderate beneficial effects, while narrative synthesis demonstrated mixed or no effect. Social interventions for social isolation and psychological interventions for loneliness were the most promising. However, caution is warranted due to the effects’ small magnitude, significant heterogeneity, and the variable quality of SRs. Digital and other interventions showed mixed or no effect; however, caution is advised in interpreting these results due to the highly diverse nature of the interventions studied. Conclusion This overview of SRs shows small to moderate effectiveness of social interventions in reducing social isolation and psychological ones in tackling loneliness. Further rigorously conducted RCTs and SRs are needed to guide policy decisions regarding the implementation of efficacious and scalable interventions. Evaluation should focus on both preventive structural interventions and tailored mitigating strategies that address specific types and causes of loneliness.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference82 articles.

1. Estimating the mental health effects of social isolation;Rohde N;Applied Research in Quality of Life,2016

2. Loneliness matters. A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms;Hawkley LC;Annals of Behavioral Medicine,2010

3. Loneliness predicts increased blood pressure: 5-year cross-lagged analyses in middle-aged and older adults;Hawkley LC;Psychology and Aging,2010

4. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses;Cacioppo JT;Psychology and Aging,2006

5. Cacioppo JT, Patrick W. Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection: WW Norton & Company; 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3