A geometric morphometric approach to testing discrete categories of backed flakes from recurrent centripetal core reduction
Author:
Bustos-Pérez Guillermo1, Gravina Brad2, Brenet Michel3, Romagnoli Francesca1
Affiliation:
1. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 2. Musée national de Préhistoire 3. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, PACEA, UMR-5199
Abstract
Abstract
Paleolithic lithic assemblages are usually dominated by flakes, which display a high degree of morphological variability. When analyzing Paleolithic lithic assemblages, it is common to classify flakes into categories based on their morphological and technological features, which are linked to the position of the flake in a reduction sequence and how removals are organized in a given production method. For the analysis of Middle Paleolithic lithic assemblages, two categories of flakes are commonly used: core edge flakes and pseudo-Levallois points. A third type, core edge flakes with a limited back, is also commonly found in the archaeological literature, providing an alternative category with a definition that does not match the two previous types but shares many of their morphological and technological features. The present study addresses whether these three flakes constitute discrete categories based on their morphological and technological attributes. Geometric morphometrics are employed on an experimental set composed of the three categories of flakes to quantify morphological variation. Machine learning models and principal components biplots are used to test the discreteness of the categories. The results indicate that geometric morphometrics succeed in capturing the morphological and technological features that characterize each type of product. Pseudo-Levallois points have the highest discreteness of the three technological products, and while some degree of mixture exists between core edge flakes and core edge flakes with a limited back, they are also highly distinguishable. We conclude that the three categories are discrete and can be employed in technological lists of products for the analysis of lithic assemblages and that geometric morphometrics is useful for testing for the validity of categories.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Adler, D. S., Wilkinson, K. N., Blockley, S., Mark, D. F., Pinhasi, R., Schmidt-Magee, B. A., et al. (2014). Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus. Science, 345(6204), 1609–1613. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256484 2. Archer, W., Djakovic, I., Brenet, M., Bourguignon, L., Presnyakova, D., Schlager, S., et al. (2021). Quantifying differences in hominin flaking technologies with 3D shape analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 150, 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102912 3. Archer, W., Pop, C. M., Rezek, Z., Schlager, S., Lin, S. C., Weiss, M., et al. (2018). A geometric morphometric relationship predicts stone flake shape and size variability. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(8), 1991–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0517-2 4. Bernard-Guelle, S. (2004). Un site moustérien dans le Jura suisse: la grotte de Cotencher (Rochefort, Neuchâtel) revisitée. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 101(4), 741–769. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2004.13066 5. Beyries, S., & Boëda, E. (1983). Étude technoloogique et traces d’utilisation des éclats débordants de Corbehem (Pas-de-Calais). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 80(9), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1983.5455
|
|