Parametric study on the decarbonization potential of structural system and concrete mix design choices for mid-rise concrete buildings

Author:

Hafez Hisham1ORCID,Bajić Petar2,Aidarov Stanislav2,Malija Xhemsi3,Drewniok Michal4,Purnell Phil4,Tošić Nikola2

Affiliation:

1. University of Leeds Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences

2. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya

3. EPFL: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne

4. University of Leeds

Abstract

Abstract

Mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings are projected to continue being the predominant typology for urban development. Thus, reducing the carbon footprint of such buildings is critical for achieving a sustainable built environment. Reducing the amount of concrete and steel in a building through structural and mix design optimization is identified as a primary resource efficiency strategy. This paper is among the first to present evidence of the decarbonization potential of these dematerialization strategies on a building level. The study combines structural design choices such as slab system design, steel reinforcement optimization and span width with materials-based strategies, such as low binder concrete and low-carbon binders. For each scenario, material quantities are calculated following design prescriptions by EN1992-1-1 while state-of-the art life cycle inventory data are adopted to calculate the carbon footprint. Results show that shifting towards more efficient structural systems (i.e., waffle slab system) could save up to 20% of the carbon footprint on the building level compared to more traditional systems, such as slab on beams and flat slabs. In addition, reducing the spans from 7.5 to 5 m can save up to 20% more. Finally, the use of low-clinker cement in low-binder concrete can save another 50% in terms of CO2 impact per built-up area. Realistically, results of the case study concluded that implementing these three strategies could reduce the typical 232 kg CO2e/m2 value of the carbon footprint of structural elements of a mid-rise building up to only 58 kg CO2e/m2, i.e., a four-fold reduction.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference61 articles.

1. International Energy, Agency (2019) Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2019. IEA, Paris, France

2. GCCA (2021) Concrete Future-The GCCA 2050 Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap for Net Zero Concretehttps://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/ (Visited on 23.05. 2023)

3. Mapping the global flow of steel: from steelmaking to end-use goods;Cullen JM;Environ Sci Technol,2012

4. Marinova S, Deetman S, van der Voet E, Daioglou V (2020) Global construction materials database and stock analysis of residential buildings between 1970–2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, p.119146

5. Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide;Miller SA;Nat Sustain,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3