Social network analysis for medical narcotics in South Korea: focusing on patients and healthcare organizations

Author:

Kim Sang-Yoon1,Cho Nam-Wook2

Affiliation:

1. Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management

2. Seoul National University of Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background: Medical narcotics must be administered under medical supervision because of their potential for misuse and abuse, leading to more dangerous and addictive substances. The control of medical narcotics requires close monitoring to ensure that they remain safe and effective. This study proposes a methodology that can effectively identify the overprescription of medical narcotics in hospitals and patients. Methods: Social network analysis (SNA) was applied to prescription networks for medical narcotics. Prescription data were obtained from the Narcotics Information Management System (NIMS) in South Korea, which contains all data narcotic usage nationwide. Two-mode networks comprising hospitals and patients were constructed based on comprehensive prescription data from 2020 to 2021 for three major narcotics: appetite suppressants, Zolpidem, and Propofol. Two-mode networks were then converted into one-mode networks for hospitals. Network structures and characteristics were analyzed to identify hospitals suspected of overprescribing and propose a method to better control medical narcotics. Results: The SNA identified hospitals that overprescribed medical narcotics. Patients suspected of experiencing narcotic addiction seek treatment in such hospitals. The structure of the network was also different for the three narcotics; while appetite suppressants and propofol networks had a more centralized structure; zolpidem networks showed a less centralized but more fragmented structure. During the analysis of the two-mode networks, two types of hospitals caught our attention: one with a high degree, meaning that potential abusers have frequently visited the hospital, and the other with a high weighted degree, meaning that the hospital may overprescribe. For appetite suppressants, these two types of hospitals matched 84.6%, compared with 30.0% for Propofol. Regarding hospital size, clinics had the largest share of the network, with the highest degree for the three narcotics. Zolpidem had the highest weighted degree in clinics, and Propofol had the highest weighted degree in general hospitals. Patients using appetite suppressants were most likely to visit multiple locations, whereas those using Zolpidem and Propofol tended to form communities around their neighborhoods. Conclusions: This study presented a network analysis of prescriptions for all medical narcotics across the country. The significance of this study lies in its analysis of nationwide narcotic use reports and the differences observed across different types of narcotics. The social network structure between hospitals and patients varies depending on the composition of the medical narcotics. Therefore, these characteristics should be considered when controlling medication with narcotics. The results of this study provide guidelines for controlling narcotic use in other countries.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference17 articles.

1. Narcotics information management system in South Korea: system development and innovation;Kim SY;BMC Health Serv Res,2023

2. UNODC. 2015. World Drug Report 2015. https://www.unodc.org/wdr2015/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.

3. NAMSDL NAMSDL. Model Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) Act. 2015. https://namsdl.org/topics/pdmp/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.

4. Sproule B. Prescription monitoring programs in Canada: Best practice and program review. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. 2015. http://nperesource.casn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/CCSA-Prescription-Monitoring-Programs-in-Canada-Report-2015-en.pdf.

5. Real-time prescription monitoring: Lessons from Tasmania;Boyles P;Australian prescriber,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3