Affiliation:
1. Chinese People`s Liberation Army No.989 hospital
2. First Medical Center, Chinese People`s Liberation Army General Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been considered by many studies to have a bidirectional relationship with periodontitis. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of different T2DM states stratified by baseline HbA1c on the clinical outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT).
Methods
This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and involved an electronic literature search (from inception to the 2nd of January 2023). We included at least two groups of patients: chronic periodontitis only (No-DM) or periodontitis and well-control/poor-control type 2 diabetes mellitus (WC/PC-T2DM). Clinical outcomes included probing depth (PD) reduction, bleeding on probing (BOP) reduction, and clinical attachment level(CAL)gain. Direct and indirect comparisons between groups were assessed by network meta-analysis, allowing us to establish a treatment ranking.
Results
Ten prospective cohort studies (11 data sets) were included for qualitative analysis and network meta-analysis. The data included in this study had high consistency; in addition, a funnel plot and Egger’s test showed that the articles had low publication bias. The network meta-analysis showed that the NSPT effect in the No-DM group was significantly better than the WC-T2DM group [Weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.01, 0.18)] and PC-T2DM group [WMD = 0.09, 95%CI (0.01, 0.18)] in terms of CAL gain and better than the PC-T2DM group [WMD = 0.15, 95%CI (0.02, 0.28)] in terms of PD reduction. According to the SUCRA value, the No-DM group had the highest probability of achieving the best NSPT outcome.
Conclusions
The findings of this systematic review revealed that the NSPT had the best therapeutic effect in patients without diabetes mellitus. Further high-quality studies are now required to validate these findings.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC