Optimal Duration and Timing of Basic-life-support-Only Intervention for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Observational Study in Japan

Author:

Takei Yutaka1,Toyama Gen1,Takahashi Tsukasa1,Omatsu Kentaro1

Affiliation:

1. Niigata University of Health and Welfare

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The study aimed to elucidate the relationship between the interval from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologically favourable 1-month survival in order to determine the appropriate duration of basic life support (BLS) without advanced interventions. Methods: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with 9,132 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of presumed cardiac origin who were bystander-witnessed and had achieved ROSC between 2018 and 2020 in Japan. Patients were classified into two groups based on the resuscitation methods as the “BLS-only group” and the “BLS with administered adrenaline (BLS-AA) group”. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that administering BLS for 9 min yielded the best neurologically outcome for patients with a shockable initial rhythm [sensitivity, 0.42; specificity, 0.27; area under the ROC curve (AUC), 0.60] in the BLS-only group. Contrastingly, for patients with a non-shockable initial rhythm, performing BLS for 6 min yielded the best neurologically outcome (sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.43; AUC, 0.63). Among patients who received adrenaline, administering BLS for 15 min yielded the best neurologically outcome for patients with shockable (sensitivity, 0.52; specificity, 0.30; AUC, 0.64) and non-shockable (sensitivity, 0.61; specificity, 0.31; AUC, 0.68) rhythms. Based on the ROC curve analysis results, we defined early ROSC achievement as within 9 min and 6 min for patients with shockable and non-shockable rhythms, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that BLS-only resuscitation had the most significant impact on early ROSC achievement in patients with shockable [odds ratio; 95% confidence interval): 9.98 (8.25–12.07) and non-shockable [28.97 (23.10–36.34)] rhythms. After propensity score matching, multivariate analysis revealed that neurologically favourable 1-month survival was associated with BLS-only resuscitation [5.00 (4.08–6.13)], night-time events [1.29 (1.03–1.62)], patient age [0.95 (0.94–0.96)], male sex [1.45 (1.16–1.81)], bystander CPR [1.55 (1.28–1.87)], initial shockable rhythms [3.21 (2.64–3.91)], transportation to level-3 hospitals [1.65 (1.37–1.98)], CPR-to-ROSC interval [0.96 (0.95–0.98)], and on-scene time [0.97 (0.95–0.99)]. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that paramedics should provide concentrated and high-quality chest compressions within the first few minutes of scene arrival prior to administering advanced interventions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3