Affiliation:
1. Ningxia Medical University
2. Ningxia Medical University General Hospital
3. Peking University First Hospital Ningxia Women's and Children's Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To use fetal HQ software to carry out quantitative analysis of the 4-chamber view (4-CV) and left and right ventricle of fetuses with Coarctation of aortic(CoA) and normal fetuses, and to explore the application value of this software in evaluating the cardiac structure and systolic function of fetuses with CoA.
Methods
fetal HQ software was used to quantitatively analyze the GSI, 24-segment SI of left and right ventricles, fractional area change (FAC) left and right ventricular area, and longitudinal contractility in 53 normal singleton fetuses and 16 fetuses with CoA, 24-segment transverse width fractional shortenin FS .p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Compared with the two groups of fetuses, the global spherical index (GSI) was significantly different (P < 0.05), and the left ventricle 18–24 segment spherical index was significantly different (P < 0.05); the right ventricle 8-11segmental spherical index was significant differences (P < 0.05); there were significant differences in left ventricular fraction area change and longitudinal strain in the CoA group (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in right ventricular fraction area change and longitudinal strain in the CoA group (P > 0.05); the fetal left ventricular 24-segment transverse width fractional shortening FS in the CoA group was significantly different in segments 1–12 (P<0.05);the FS 1–4 segments were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
fetal HQ technique can quickly and easily obtain the spherical index and systolic function parameters of fetal heart, and provides a new method for quantitative analysis of fetal heart structure and systolic function with CoA.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference18 articles.
1. BackerCL. MavroudisC. Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project:patent ductus arteriosus. coarctation of the aorta,interrupted aortic arch[J].Ann ThoracSurg,2000,69(4 Suppl):S298-307.DO1:10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01280-1.
2. Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW. Congenital heart discase in 56,109 births. Incidence and natural history[J].Circulation,1971,43(3):323–332.DO1:10.1161/01.cir.43.3.323.
3. Lytzen R, Vejlstrup N et al. Live-born major congenital heart discase in denmark: incidencc, detection rate, and termination of pregnancy rate from 1996 to 2013[J].JAMACardiol.2018.3(9):829–837.DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2009.
4. Bjornard K, Richle-Colarusso T, Gilboa SM et al. Patterns in the prevalence of congenital heart defects, metropolitan Atlanta,1978 to 2005[].Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol.2013,97(2):87–94.DOI:10.1002/bdra.23111.
5. Chinese expert consensus on surgical treatment of congenital heart disease (11): coarctation of the aorta and interruption of the aortic arch [J];Zhang H;Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020