Flexibility in Choosing Decision Policies in Gathering Discrete Evidence Over Time
Author:
Affiliation:
1. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
2. Department of Computer Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
3. Sharif University of Technology
Abstract
The brain can remarkably adapt its decision-making process to suit the dynamic environment and diverse aims and demands. The brain’s flexibility can be classified into three categories: flexibility in choosing solutions, decision policies, and actions. We employ two experiments to explore flexibility in decision policy: a visual object categorization task and an auditory object categorization task. Both tasks required participants to accumulate discrete evidence over time, with the only difference being the sensory state of the stimuli. We aim to investigate how the brain demonstrates flexibility in selecting decision policies in different sensory contexts when the solution and action remain the same. Our results indicate that the decision policy of the brain in integrating information is independent of inter-pulse interval across these two tasks. However, the decision policy based on how the brain ranks the first and second pulse of evidence changes flexibly. We show that the sequence of pulses does not affect the choice accuracy in the auditory mode. However, in the visual mode, the first pulse had the larger leverage on decisions. Our research underscores the importance of incorporating diverse contexts to improve our understanding of the brain’s flexibility in real-world decision-making.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex;Mante V;Nature,2013
2. Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making;Churchland AK;Curr Opin Behav Sci,2016
3. Decision making as a window on cognition;Shadlen MN;Neuron,2013
4. Neural Mechanisms that Make Perceptual Decisions Flexible;Okazawa G;Annu Rev Physiol,2023
5. Multisensory integration and the society for neuroscience: then and now;Stein BE;J Neurosci,2020
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3