Prognostic Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized or Locoregionally Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: a Population-Based and Propensity Score Matched SEER Analysis

Author:

Xiong Yichen1,Yang Ziyi1,Gong Albie2,Wu Ziyou1,Liu Shilei1,Zhu Yidi1,Song Xiaoling1,Chu Bingfeng1,Wu Xiangsong1,Gong Wei1

Affiliation:

1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

2. University of British Columbia

Abstract

Abstract Background: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NACT on overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC, and to explore possible protective predictors for prognosis. Methods: Data for patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC (ie, categories cTx-cT4, cN0-2, and cM0) were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients in the NACT and non-NACT groups were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:3, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to analyze the impact of NACT on OS and CSS. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to identify the possible prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify patients who would benefit from NACT. Results: Of the 2,676 cases included, 78 NACT and 234 non-NACT patients remained after PSM. In localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, the median OS of the NACT and non-NACT was 31 and 16 months (log-rank P<0.01), and the median CSS of NACT and non-NACT was 32 and 17 months (log-rank P<0.01), respectively. Longer median OS (31 vs 17 months, log-rank P<0.01) and CSS (32 vs 20 months, log-rank P<0.01) was associated with NACT compared with surgery alone. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that NACT, stage and surgery type were prognostic factors for OS and CSS in GBC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed the survival hazard ratios (HRs) of NACT versus non-NACT for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients were significant in most subgroups. Conclusions: NACT may provide therapeutic benefits for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, especially for those with advanced stage, node-positive, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated disease. NACT combined with radical surgery was associated with a survival advantage. Therefore, NACT combined with surgery may provide a better treatment option for resectable GBC patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Cancer statistics in China, 2015;Chen W;CA Cancer J Clin,2016

2. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries;Sung H;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

3. Lyu wencai, Zou yun, Wen shaung, et al. Analysis of the incidence and epidemic trend of gallbladder cancer in China. Chin J dig Surg. 2019(02):186–189.

4. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and genetic risk associations;Schmidt MA;Chin Clin Oncol,2019

5. Gallbladder cancer;Roa JC;Nat Rev Dis Primers,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3