Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes in Qualified and Non-Qualified Medicare Admissions in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital During Year One of the Pandemic Waiver Period

Author:

Grevelding Pete1ORCID,Corbett John1ORCID,Hrdlicka Henry C.1ORCID,Chieffo Christopher B.1,Sullivan Kathleen1

Affiliation:

1. Gaylord Specialty Healthcare

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To compare the characteristics and outcomes of Medicare insured patients admitted to the long-term acute care hospital (LTCH) setting, before and during the first year of the CARES Act, and to determine whether there is functional benefit or projected cost-savings associated with admitting non-qualified patients beyond the waiver period. Data Source and Study Setting: Using the LTRAX outcome and demographic reporting system, primary data was collected for all Medicare insured patients admitted March 2019 through February 2021. Study activities were conducted at an independent LTCH located in Connecticut, USA. Study Design: This was a single-site retrospective cohort study. For each cohort, demographics and CMS required assistance scores for metrics such as self-care, communication, and functional mobility were compared. A sub-analysis of the stroke population was also conducted. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Collected data were separated by admission date [historic control cohort (March 2019 through February 2020) or COVID-19 cohort (March 2020 through February 2021)] and qualified status. Principle Findings: Analysis revealed that non-qualified and qualified Medicare patients admitted before and during the COVID-19 waiver period were characteristically similar, were functionally similar at admission, and received a similar significant rehabilitation benefit. The stroke sub-analysis again demonstrated functional similarities between cohorts. However, in this sub-population, the traditionally non-qualified population saw a significant increase in the proportion of patients discharged home and a significant reduction in acute care readmissions within 30-days post LTCH discharge. Conclusions: Despite not meeting the three-midnight qualification, the non-qualified population was functionally similar at admission and received a similar rehabilitation benefit as the qualified population, while discharging home more often. This data then makes a compelling case to eliminate the three-midnight stay qualifier for LTCH admission, which would ultimately improve the rehabilitation outcomes and decrease the lifetime cost of care and caregiver burden for the traditionally non-qualified Medicare population.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Conditions for Coverage (CfCs) & Conditions of Participation (CoPs) | CMS. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CFCsAndCoPs

2. Care Guidelines. MCG Health. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.mcg.com/care-guidelines/care-guidelines/

3. InterQual®. Change Healthcare. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.changehealthcare.com/clinical-decision-support/interqual

4. What a Difference a Word Makes: Qualifying Three-Day Stays | Revenue Cycle Advisor. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://revenuecycleadvisor.com/news-analysis/what-difference-word-makes-qualifying-three-day-stays

5. 42 CFR § 412.521 - Basis of payment. LII / Legal Information Institute. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/412.521

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3