Population-adjusted Rates of Rectal Prolapse Repair in Washington State Over a Contemporary, 12-year Time Period

Author:

Soriano Celine1,Tam Justina1,Koenig Hannah1,Kaplan Jennifer1,Kobashi Kathleen1,Moonka Ravi1,Lee Una1,Simianu Vlad V.1

Affiliation:

1. Virginia Mason Medical Center

Abstract

AbstractBackground Rectal prolapse, with or without concurrent vaginal prolapse, is a debilitating condition. Despite debate regarding the optimal surgical approach, operative repair remains the mainstay of treatment. Our objective was to describe trends of rectal prolapse repair in Washington State. Methods A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing rectal prolapse repair was created from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System. Age- and sex-adjusted rates of rectal prolapse repair (RPR) alone and concurrent rectal and vaginal prolapse repair (CRVR), trends over time, and factors associated with variation in rates are described. Results There were 2755 hospitalizations in which patients underwent RPR, with 33.3% undergoing CRVR. Seventy-five percent of all repairs were in patients older than 50. Rates for rectal prolapse repair went from 3.72/100,000 people in 2008 to 3.25/100,000 people in 2019 (p = 0.003) and did not increase in patients ages 65–79 (p = 0.09) or older than 80 (p = 0.945). Perineal repairs accounted for 31% of repairs and declined after 2014. Minimally-invasive abdominal repairs doubled from 32.5% in 2008 to 65.4% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Seventy-five percent of patients lived within 20 miles of the treating facility. Conclusions Despite a broad shift towards abdominal, minimally invasive approaches, population-adjusted rates of rectal prolapse repair have remained stable in Washington State, even in elderly demographics in which rectal prolapse is more prevalent. Most patients receive operations at local facilities, but rates of repair vary with population size and number of surgeons, suggesting there are other factors driving care for rectal prolapse at a population level.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Rectal prolapse: A search for the “best” operation;Azimuddin K;Am Surg,2001

2. Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse. Vol. 60, Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2017. p. 1121–31.

3. Complications after rectal prolapse surgery: Does approach matter?;Russell MMG;Dis Colon Rectum,2012

4. PROSPER: A randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse;Senapati A;Color Dis,2013

5. Cirocco WC. In search of the optimal operation for rectal prolapse: the saga continues… Vol. 23, Techniques in Coloproctology. 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3