Analysis of Outcomes of Traumatic Colon and Rectal Injuries Managed With or Without Fecal Diversion

Author:

Mallick Taha1,Hasan Mahera2

Affiliation:

1. Appalachian Regional Healthcare

2. Harlem Hospital Center

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Traumatic colorectal injuries can be managed by either fecal diversion or primary repair / resection and anastomosis. We aimed to study differences in outcomes in adult patients managed with or without fecal diversion at time of initial operation. Methodology: Using ICD-9 codes adult patients (18 years and older) in the National Trauma Databank with colonic and rectal injuries were identified for the years 2013-2015. The following datapoints were collected: age, gender, race, injury severity score (ISS), pulse rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and length of stay (LOS). Subjects with missing data or cardiac arrest at time of arrival were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not fecal diversion was performed at time of initial operation. Incidence of the following morbidities was analyzed: acute kidney injury (AKI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), pneumonia, deep surgical site infection (SSI), severe sepsis, unplanned intubation and unplanned return to OR. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS for windows. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of 2,598,467 patients, 8434 (0.32%) sustained a colonic or rectal injury. Mean age was 32.1 years. 87.8% were male. 665 patients (Group 1) underwent fecal diversion while 3866 (Group 2) underwent resection / anastomosis or primary repair. Groups 1 and 2 were noted to be similar in terms of ISS (median of 14 in both groups), age (33.9 vs 33.1 years; p=0.15), percentage of male patients (87.1% vs 88.7%; p=0.23), SBP (125 vs 123 mmHg; p=0.051) and pulse rate (95.8 vs 97.3; p=0.46) respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of AKI (Odds ratio (OR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.823-2.04), ARDS (OR: 1.42, 95% CI 0.732-2.75), DVT (OR: 1.38, 95% CI 0.827-2.30), pulmonary embolism (OR: 0.808, 95% CI 0.451-1.45), pneumonia (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.729-1.47), deep SSI (OR: 0.768, 95% CI 0.522-1.13), severe sepsis (OR: 1.37, 95% CI 0.862-2.17), unplanned intubation (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.650-2.02) or unplanned return to operating room (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.793-1.53). LOS was 15.3 and 15.2 days for groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.92). Conclusion There does not appear to be a difference in outcomes between patients who undergo fecal diversion and those who do not. Therefore the decision to perform resection / anastomosis or primary repair should not be influenced by a concern for post-operative fecal leakage and subsequent morbidity but should be based on hemodynamic status and extent of injury.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3