The Factors Affecting the Choice of Supervisor Type for Postoperative Exercises in Cancer Patients with Bone Tumor Resection -A Qualitative Study

Author:

Mete Emel1,Kablan Nilüfer1,Akan Mehmet1,Özkan Korhan1

Affiliation:

1. İstanbul Medeniyet University

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the motivators and barriers affecting the choice of supervisor type for post-operative exercises and the effect of the experience with the preferred supervisor on future type of supervisor choice in patients with bone tumor resection. Design: This study used a qualitative approach with thematic analysis. Subjects participated in either supervised or non-supervised exercise program according to their choices. Semi-structured, in-depth manner interviews were done with participants both pre and post-exercises period. Two researchers determined codes and themes by analysing content using Atlas.ti.23. Participants: Subjects underwent bone tumor resection surgery were included. Results Participants preferred face to face supervisor because of desire feeling safe, ensuring that the exercises are done correctly, and adhering to the program in a disciplined manner. Time flexibility and home comfort encouraged the choice of online supervisor. Negative experiences, health system problems, and difficulty in transport made the participants away from the preference of face-to-face supervisor. Participants with self-discipline did not choose the presence of a supervisor while doing exercise. Technical inadequacies were found to be the only barrier to choosing the online supervisor type. Conclusion The factors determining the supervisor type were individual, environmental and related to health professional factors. Self-discipline, the need for a companion, transportation, the need to feel confident are the strongest factors that determine the type of supervisor.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3