Characterizing the contributions of cue familiarity for the retrieval of autobiographical memories

Author:

Gurguryan Lauri1,Yang Haopei2,Köhler Stefan2,Sheldon Signy1

Affiliation:

1. McGill University

2. University of Western Ontario

Abstract

Abstract Retrieving an autobiographical memory requires a cue to initiate processes related to accessing and then elaborating on a past personal experience. Prior work has shown that the familiarity of a cue can influence the autobiographical memory retrieval process. Extending on this work, we tested how different aspects of cue familiarity—i.e., amount of past exposure and amount of semantic knowledge associated with the cue concept—can affect how we access and remember in detail autobiographical memories. In Experiment 1, we measured reaction times to access and retrieve memories in response to cue words. In Experiment 2 we examined the details with which participants described memories in response to cues. For both experiments, participants provided estimates of lifetime exposure and semantic knowledge associated with each cue. In Experiment 1, we found lifetime exposure, independently of estimates of semantic knowledge, led to quicker memory access and in Experiment 2, we found both lifetime exposure and semantic knowledge interactively enhanced the ability to described detailed memories. These results provide new evidence that distinct features of familiar cues—lifetime exposure and semantic knowledge—differently contribute to how autobiographical memories are retrieved and described.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference64 articles.

1. The fan effect: New results and new theories;Anderson John R;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1999

2. Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory;Anderson John Robert;Cognitive Psychology,1974

3. Imagining the near and far future: The role of location familiarity;Arnold KM;Memory & Cognition,2011

4. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology;Bartlett FC;Cambridge, Social Psychology,1932

5. Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories;Barzykowski K;British Journal of Psychology,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3