Bedside Evaluation of Edema: A simple technique for quantitative evaluation of an important clinical sign

Author:

Schreiber Richard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background: Edema is a cardinal clinical manifestation. Most clinicians measure edema semi-quantitatively, which is susceptible to subjective and non-reproducible intra- and inter-observer variation. A quick and reliable quantitative method is needed for more accurate measurement. Objective: To demonstrate the reliability of a new clinical examination technique, verified against a novel edema measuring device. Design: A convenience sample enrolled in one day at a community hospital. Patients: Seventeen adult patients with various clinical conditions. One patient was not examined by request and was excluded from analysis. Interventions: Clinical and device estimation of pit depth of edema created by manual pressure at a standard location on 27 limbs. Key Results: Clinical and device measurements were precisely the same 50% of the time; differences in measurements never exceeded 1 mm. The 95% confidence interval was 0.21 with an R2 statistic of 0.87 for all depths of edema, using either clinical or device measurement as the criterion standard, demonstrating excellent correlation between clinical examination and use of the device. Conclusions: Clinical evaluation can estimate edema pit depth in millimeters very accurately. A novel edema measuring device confirms these measurements independently and objectively. It is hypothesized that this new technique will help standardize the teaching of the clinical examination of edema, increase the utility of edema depth measurement over time, and increase intra- and inter-observer reliability of edema evaluation. There is no longer a justification for semi-quantitative determination of edema. NIH trial registry number: NCT03296085

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. DeGowin E, DeGowin R. Bedside Diagnostic Examination. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc; 1976. p. 330.

2. LeBlond R, Brown D, Suneja M, Szot J. DeGowin’s Diagnostic Examination. 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2015. pp. 40 and 91.

3. Suneja M, Szot J, LeBlond R, Brown D. DeGowin’s Diagnostic Examination. 11th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2020. pp. 314–315.

4. Bates B, Bickley L, Hoekelman R. Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 437–438.

5. Bickley L, Szilagyi P, Hoffman R. Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017. p. 528–9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3