Affiliation:
1. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine: The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
2. Janssen Pharmaceutical KK: Janssen Pharma Kabushiki Kaisha
3. New York University Grossman School of Medicine
4. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
5. University of Maryland Medical Center
6. Ain Shams University
7. Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Combined micro-PET/CT scanners are widely employed to investigate models of brain disorders in rodents using PET-based coregistration. We examined if CT-based coregistration could improve estimates of brain dimensions and consequently estimates of nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) in rodent PET studies.
Procedures
PET and CT scans were acquired on 5 female and 5 male CD-1 mice with PET and CT scans were acquired on 5 female and 5 male CD-1 mice with 3-[18F]fluoro-5-(2-pyridinylethynyl)benzonitrile ([18F]FPEB), a radiotracer for the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5). In the proposed PET/CT (PTCT) approach, the tracer-specific standard volume was dimension-customized to each animal using the scaling factors from CT-to-standard CT coregistration to simplify PET-to-standard PET coregistration (i.e., 3 CT- and 6 PET-derived parameters). For comparison, conventional PET-based coregistration was performed with 9 (PT9) or 12 (PT12) parameters. PET frames were transferred to the standard space by the three approaches (PTCT, PT9, and PT12) to obtain regional time-activity curves (TACs) and BPND in 14 standard volumes of interest (VOIs). Lastly, CT images of the animals were transferred to the standard space by CT-based parameters from PTCT and with the scaling factors replaced with those from PET-based PT9 to evaluate agreement of the skull to the standard CT.
Results
The PET-based approaches showed various degrees of underestimations of scaling factors in the posterior-anterior-direction compared to PTCT, which resulted in negatively proportional overestimation of radioactivity in the cerebellum (reference region) up to 20%, and proportional, more prominent underestimation of BPND in target regions down to -50%. The skulls of individual animals agreed with the standard skull for scaling factors from PTCT but not for the scaling factors from PT9, which suggested inaccuracy of the latter.
Conclusions
The results indicated that conventional PET-based coregistration approaches could yield biased estimates of BPND due to erroneous estimates of brain dimensions when applied to tracers for which the cerebellum serves as reference region. The proposed PTCT provides evidence of a quantitative improvement over PET-based approaches for brain studies using micro-PET/CT scanners.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC