A mixed-methods process evaluation of a combined physical activity and psychological therapy intervention for socially disadvantaged young people.

Author:

Thomas Jennifer1,Crone Diane2,Bowes Nicola2,Thirlaway Katie2,Mackintosh Kelly A.1

Affiliation:

1. Swansea University

2. Cardiff Metropolitan University

Abstract

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that interventions combining physical activity with psychological therapy can improve engagement, retention, and psychological outcomes of young people experiencing homelessness (YPEH). However, the challenges associated with implementing such interventions remain poorly understood. To address this lack of understanding, the aim of this study was to evaluate the barriers and facilitators to implementation of a community-based intervention comprising physical activity and psychotherapy for YPEH. Methods: A retrospective mixed-methods process evaluation was undertaken to explore recruitment and retention, fidelity, dose delivered, and dose received, of the intervention. Quantitative data sources included attendance registers, which were analysed using descriptive statistics, with qualitative data obtained from interviews with implementers, and focus groups with participants, which were analysed using a predominantly deductive thematic approach. This data was subsequently triangulated with intervention-fidelity monitoring forms, and non-participant observations to support interpretation of the findings. Results: Six participants initially enrolled into the study, with three achieving >75% attendance. Challenges to recruitment and retention were multi-factorial, however, a lack of organisational resources (staff support and transportation) appeared to have the greatest influence. Implementer interviews and monitoring forms evidenced that fidelity and dose delivered of both intervention components (physical activity and psychotherapy) were good. Moreover, triangulated data suggested that adaptations did not adversely impact on effectiveness. Dose received by participants was indicative of their engagement with sessions rather than attendance, including perceived quality of the intervention received. Contextual barriers and facilitators to implementation outcomes were identified across individual, organisational, and intervention-level domains. Conclusions: Implementation-related factors across multiple levels contributed to challenges encountered, rather than a lack of feasibility or acceptability of a combined physical activity and psychotherapy intervention. Allowing flexibility for necessary adaptations was identified as a key facilitator to intervention delivery and contributed to positive experiences reported by participants. Working with stakeholders from project inception may be necessary for overcoming identified barriers, could help facilitate scale-up of the intervention, and facilitate the translation from research into routine practice.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3