Status, associated factors, and reasons for bypassing the childbirth center among postpartum women in the Dire Dawa Administration, Ethiopia: A Mixed Study

Author:

Mohammed Aminu1,Hailu Mickiale1,Getnet Tewodros1,Manaye Yibekal1

Affiliation:

1. Dire Dawa University

Abstract

Abstract Background: Obstetrics care in a nearby health facility is an important strategy to reduce maternal and child complications, including death during childbirth. Bypassing the nearby birthing health facility is common in developing countries, including Ethiopia. But, in Ethiopia and the study area, little is known about the extent, determinants, and reasons for bypassing them. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing all these gaps, which are an important indicator of the quality of obstetrics care that the health system needs to address. Methods: A facility-based mixed (quantitative cross-sectional and phenomenological qualitative) study was conducted at selected public health centers in Dire Dawa city from December 01 to 30, 2022. A simple random sampling technique was used to select 635 participants for the quantitative study and purposive sampling for the qualitative study. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a pre-tested structured questionnaire and semi-structured questions for in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were entered and cleaned by Epi DATA (Version 3.1) and analyzed using SPSS (Version 22). A P-value < 0.25 at bivariate to select variables for multivariate and ≤ 0.05 at multivariate with 95% confidence intervals was considered statistically significant. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis using open-source software. Results: 635 postpartum women for quantitative and twelve participants for qualitative were included. At childbirth centers, the overall bypass rate was 30.9% (95% CI: 27.1%–34.55 %). A higher age group (AOR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.43–3.82), rural residence (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11-3.22), no formal education (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.23–4.16), obstetric care needs during antenatal care (AOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.33–4.22), and health professionals’ behavior (AOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.33–4.22) and health professionals’ behavior (AOR = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.99–4.78) were associated with a higher likelihood of bypassing. Health care facility, personal perception, and health care worker-related factors were the main identified themes in the qualitative results. Conclusion: The extent of bypassing the nearby childbirth health facility was moderate and associated with women’s age, education, resident area, obstetrics care during antenatal visits, and health care workers’ approaches. In the qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged for the reasons for bypassing a nearby childbirth health facility: the health care facility, health professionals, and service users’ perception-related reasons. Stakeholders were advised to increase obstetrics services (supplies, equipment), respectful care, and education while taking pregnant women's residence and education level into account, as well as conduct additional community-based research.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review of implementation factors;Kinney MV;Health policy and planning,2021

2. Health facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: successes, challenges, and implications for the 2030 development agenda;Doctor HV;BMC public health,2018

3. National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis;Hug L;The Lancet Global Health,2019

4. Accurate surveillance of maternal deaths is an international priority;Shennan AH;bmj,2022

5. A New Method for Obtaining Global Estimates of Maternal Mortality;Atmadja S;ADI Journal on Recent Innovation,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3