Assessment of vaccine wastage and associated factors in Rukungiri District, Southwestern Uganda, 2018–2019: a mixed-methods study

Author:

Kemigisha Miriah1,Migisha Richard1,Kyamwanga Imelda. T.1

Affiliation:

1. Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract

Background Vaccine wastage undermines the cost-effectiveness of immunization programs, especially in resource-constrained settings. However, data on vaccine wastage in Uganda are limited. We assessed the magnitude of vaccine wastage, its causes, and associated factors in Rukungiri District, South-western Uganda. Methods In a cross-sectional mixed-methods study, we analyzed data from the District Health Information Systems database and immunization program records at health facilities in Rukungiri District for July 2018–June 2019. Wastage rates were calculated as the proportion of vaccine doses wasted after an immunization session, expressed as a percentage of the total doses opened. Chi-square or Fischer’s exact tests were used to examine the association between wastage and various factors. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with health workers involved in immunization activities and analyzed thematically. Results Vaccine wastage rates varied across different vaccines, with BCG at 81.1%, OPV at 31.6%, IPV at 31.3%, DPT-HepB-Hib at 20.0%, PCV-10 at 10.2%, MCV at 57.7%, and Rota virus vaccine at 2.1%. The main cause of wastage was discarding leftover doses. For BCG, larger health facilities had significantly lower wastage than smaller ones (Hospital 66.0%, HCIV 74.3%, HCIII 80.6%,HCII 87.0%, p = 0.005), facilities with predominantly small session sizes had higher wastage rates than those with mixed or large session sizes (84.4%vs64.3%vs62.0%p < 0.01) and fewer static sessions per month were associated with higher wastage (82.1%vs 66.0%p = 0.013). Good coverage was linked to lower wastage for DPT-HepB-Hib and PCV-10 (DPT-HepB-Hib 16.8% vs 31.2%p = 0.033 PCV-10 9.1%vs13.7%p = 0.001). Freeze-dried vaccines had a substantially higher wastage rate of 75.0% compared to liquid vaccines at 20.2% (p < 0.01). Injectable vaccines had a higher wastage rate (47.1%) than oral vaccines (22.6%, p < 0.01). Larger vial sizes were also associated with higher wastage rates. Knowledge and skills gaps were identified in stock and cold chain management practices. Conclusion Wastage rates for several vaccines exceeded national limits, primarily due to discarding leftover doses. Factors like vaccine type, administration method, vial size, and facility size influenced wastage. Targeted strategies, including stock management improvements and health worker training, could enhance immunization program cost-effectiveness and sustainability in the region

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. WHO. Immunization. 2022 5/12/2019 [cited 2022 1/11/2022]; https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/immunization.

2. WHO. Monitoring Vaccine Wastage at Country Level:Guidelines for Programme managers. 2005 May 2005 [cited 2017 4-7-2017]; www.who.int/vaccines-documents/.

3. Vaccine wastage assesment in a primary care setting in urban india;Palanivel C;J Pediatr Sci,2012

4. Assessment of vaccine wastage in South Sudan;Bol J;Pan Afr Med J,2021

5. WHO. Revising Global Indicative Wastage Rates: A WHO Initiative for Better Planning and Forecasting of Vaccine Supply Needs.. 2019 8/4/2019 [cited 2021 13/3/2021]; Concept Note]. https://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/supply_chain/resources/Revising_Wastage_Concept_Note.pdf?ua=1.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3