Prenatal maternal stress: triangulating evidence for intrauterine exposure effects on birth and early childhood outcomes across multiple approaches

Author:

Lund Ingunn Olea1,Hannigan Laurie J.1,Ask Helga1,Askelund Adrian2,Hegemann Laura2,Corfield Elizabeth C.2,Wootton Robyn E.3,Ahmadzadeh Yasmin4,Smith George Davey3,McAdams Tom A.4,Ystrom Eivind5,Havdahl Alexandra1

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health

2. Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus

3. University of Bristol

4. King's College London

5. University of Oslo

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Maternal stress during pregnancy may impact offspring development via changes in the intrauterine environment. However, genetic and environmental factors shared between mothers and children might skew our understanding of this pathway. This study assesses whether prenatal maternal stress has causal links to offspring birthweight, gestational age, or emotional and behavioral difficulties, triangulating across methods that account for various measured and unmeasured confounders. Methods: We used data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), including maternal reports on prenatal stress at work, at home, and via stressful life events as exposures. Outcomes were children’s birth weight and gestational age, from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and maternal reports on early childhood emotional and behavioral difficulties. We assessed associations using four approaches: sibling control analyses, gene-environment interaction analyses, intergenerational Mendelian Randomization (MR), and negative control (i.e., post-natal stress) analyses. Results: Maternal prenatal stress was observationally associated with lower birthweight (e.g., 𝛽work = -0.01 [95%CI: -0.02,-0.01]), earlier birth (e.g., 𝛽work = -0.04 [95%CI:-0.04,-0.03])), and more emotional (e.g., 𝛽events = [0.08 95%CI:0.07,0.9]) and behavioral difficulties (e.g., 𝛽relationship = 0.08 [95%CI: 0.07,0.09]) in the full sample (N = 112,784). However, sibling control analyses (N = 36,511), revealed substantial attenuation of all associations after accounting for familial factors. Gene-environment interaction models (N = 76,288) showed no clear evidence of moderation of associations by mothers’ polygenic scores for traits linked to stress sensitivity. Intergenerational MR analyses (N = 29,288) showed no clear evidence of causal effects of maternal plasma cortisol on any offspring outcomes. Negative control exposure analyses revealed similar effect sizes whether exposures were measured prenatally or postnatally. Conclusion: Our results indicate that links between prenatal maternal stress and variation in early offspring outcomes are more likely to be confounded than causal. While no observational study can rule out causality, the consistency of our findings across different approaches is striking. Other sources of prenatal stress or more extreme levels may represent intrauterine causal risk factors for offspring development. Nonetheless, our research contributes to identifying boundary conditions of the fetal programming and developmental origins of health and disease hypotheses, which may not be as universal as sometimes assumed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference109 articles.

1. Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, Chey T, Jackson JW, Patel V et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2014 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Apr 18];43(2):476–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu038.

2. Godfrey KM, Barker DJ. Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr [Internet]. 2001 Apr [cited 2023 Sep 26];4(2b):611–24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/fetal-programming-and-adult-health/3BB0394BBC80F4DC3B348ECD8EBC460D.

3. Prenatal stress and the programming of the HPA axis;Glover V;Neurosci Biobehav Rev,2010

4. Barker DJP. Mothers, babies, and disease in later life. London: BMJ; 1994. pp. 1–80.

5. Gillman MW. Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2005 Oct 27 [cited 2024 Mar 17];353(17):1848–50. https://www-nejm-org.ezproxy.uio.no/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe058187.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3