Comparison of two sedation protocols for long electroretinography in horses using the Koijman electrode

Author:

Corradini Ignacio1,López-Murcia María1,Barba Marta1,Zebarjadian Sina1,Rodilla Vicent1,Mayordomo-Febrer Aloma1

Affiliation:

1. Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities

Abstract

Abstract Background Nowadays in addition to work and transport, horses are also used for competition and pleasure riding purposes. For all these activities vision has a critical role. Electroretinography is the most used test to diagnose diseases of the retinal outer segment. There is a wide variety of devices to perform the electroretinography being the main differences in the corneal electrode and the light stimulation. The Koijman electrode has been tested in dogs but not in horses. The main purpose of this study was to compare electroretinography parameters from horses sedated with detomidine alone or in combination with butorphanol, during a standardized protocol using the Koijman electrode and RETI-port® system. Seven mares, were allocated to the detomidine (D) and detomidine-butorphanol (DB) group in a randomised, controlled, crossover study. Friedman's and Willcoxon-signed ranked tests were used to compare the electroretinogram (ERG) parameters. A Student t-test was used to compare differences in the number of artefacts and valid values obtained under both sedation protocols. Results Dark adaptation peaked at 16 minutes in both groups. No significant differences in ERG parameters between both groups were observed. During the mixed rod and cone response evaluation under scotopic conditions, most mares made a movement of the head resulting in a high number of artefacts. The DB group showed a non-significant tendency to have fewer artefacts and a longer duration of sedation compared to the D group. Conclusions The Koijman electrode and the RETI-port® can be used to perform a standardized long protocol in horses with some adaptations.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference22 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3