Online Education Isn’t the Best Choice: Evidence-Based Medical Education in the Post-epidemic Era—A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Liu Jiarui1,Liang Jun2,Lang Jie1,Zhang Lijia1,Tang Mingwen1,Chen Xinyu1,Xie Yan1,Zhang Jianling1,Su Liyu1,Wang Xin3,Zhang Yi1

Affiliation:

1. Zunyi Medical University

2. Guangdong Light Industry Vocational and Technical College, Light Chemical Engineering College

3. Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic led many educational institutions to shift to online courses, making blended education a significant trend in teaching. We examined the effectiveness of blended learning in an evidence-based medicine course.Methods We compared the examination scores of a blended learning group, an online only group, and a traditional offline group and conducted a questionnaire survey on students’ preferences for different learning modes and the reasons for their preferences. A total of 2100 undergraduate students in clinical medicine were included in this cross-sectional study. Examination results were collected, and questionnaires were administered to the study participants. We compared the mean theoretical scores and exam pass rates of the three teaching groups using ANOVA and c2test for multiple comparisons.Results The blended group’s theoretical scores and pass rate were significantly higher than those of the offline and online groups. Furthermore, 71.6% preferred the blended teaching mode. Most students believed that blended teaching was the most effective mode—offline education: 7.86%; online education: 26.14%; blended education: 66%. Subsequently, in a questionnaire administered to a blended group of students, their foremost reason for liking online instruction was ‘flexible in time and space’ (99%), followed by ‘can be viewed repeatedly, facilitating a better understanding of knowledge points’ (98%). Their foremost reason for liking offline teaching was ‘helps to create a good learning atmosphere’ (97%), followed by ‘teachers can control students’ learning status in real time’ (89%).Conclusions This study explored the effectiveness of learning in evidence-based medicine courses by comparing the learning outcomes and personal perceptions of three different teaching modes. This is the first cross-sectional study in which three different teaching models are compared and discussed in an evidence-based medicine course. We also elaborate on the specific instructional protocols for each model. This study shows that using a blended education approach in evidence-based medicine courses can improve students’ learning motivation, autonomy, and satisfaction. It also enhances instructional efficiency, thereby improving students’ understanding of the course content.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment - A case study of China;Wang Q;Sci Total Environ,2020

2. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable development goals - A survey;Wang Q;Environ Res,2021

3. WHO., "The Director-General declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), WHO’s highest level of alarm," Ed., pp. Accessed, https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#, 2020.

4. What does the China's economic recovery after COVID-19 pandemic mean for the economic growth and energy consumption of other countries?;Wang Q;J Clean Prod,2021

5. Preventing carbon emission retaliatory rebound post-COVID-19 requires expanding free trade and improving energy efficiency;Wang Q;Sci Total Environ,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3