Comparison of Different Localization Needles and Postures in Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

Author:

Wang Zengming1,Li Bin,Hu Zhonghui2,Zhao Qingtao2,Zhang Xiaopeng2,Zhao Huanfen2,Xue Wenfei2,Zhao Hongzhen2,Duan Guochen2,Xu Shun3

Affiliation:

1. Hebei North University

2. Hebei General Hospital

3. First Hospital of China Medical University

Abstract

Abstract

Background With advances in imaging testing and surgical procedures, more and more nodules with smaller diameters and deeper locations have been given surgical indications. The preoperative localization of those nodules is necessary. We conducted a retrospective single-center study comparing the effectiveness and comfort of the four-hook needle and hook-wire needle in terms of localization preoperative. We also compared the effect of different postures taken by patients on localization effectiveness. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 692 patients following preoperative CT-guided localization. Patients were divided into different groups according to the different localization needles and the different postures taken during localization. Results There was no statistical difference in total complications between the four-hook needle group and the hook-wire needle group (P > 0.05). The chest pain score in the four-hook needle group was lower than the hook-wire needle group (P = 0.001). The incidence of decoupling in the four-hook needle group was significantly lower than the hook-wire needle group (P < 0.05). The four-hook needle group had better performance in terms of localization operation time, operation time, intraoperative bleeding and first-day drainage (P < 0.05). Compared with the supine and lateral groups, the prone posture group had better performance in total complications and localization operation time, and worse performance in decoupling and chest pain (P < 0.05). Conclusions The four-hook needle has better effectiveness on localization and comfort in patient than the hook-wire needle, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application. The patient's different postures during localization procedure may affect the localization results.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3