Is radioiodine ablation with 30 mCi 131I necessary in low-risk thyroid cancer patients? Results from a long-term follow-up prospective study.

Author:

Ilera Veronica1ORCID,Califano Inés2,Cavallo Andrea3,Faure Eduardo4,Vázquez Adriana5,Pitoia Fabián6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hospital General de Agudos Jose Maria Ramos Mejia

2. Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo

3. Hospital Universitario Austral

4. Hospital Churruca-Visca

5. Hospital General de Agudos Carlos G Durand

6. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín: Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin

Abstract

Abstract In patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), remnant ablation with radioiodine (RA) after total thyroidectomy (TT) is controversial. No benefits have been demonstrated in terms of mortality or disease-free survival. Recent evidence found that RA did not improve mid-term outcomes. Purpose: to evaluate initial response to treatment and long-term follow-up status in low-risk DTC patients after TT vs. TT+RA. Methods: prospective multicenter non-randomized study; 174 low-risk DTC that underwent TT were recruited and were divided in two groups according to RA (87 ablated and 87 non-ablated). Response to treatment was evaluated between 6-18 months after thyroidectomy and at the end of follow-up with thyroglobulin, anti-thyroglobulin antibodies levels and neck ultrasonography. Results: baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Ablated patients: median age 45.5 years, 84% females, 95.4% papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), mean tumor size 16mm; non-ablated: median age 45 years, 88.5% females, 96.6% PTC, mean tumor size 14 mm. Response to initial treatment was similar between both groups, with less than 2% of structural incomplete response. Final status was evaluated in 139 cases after a median follow-up of 60 months. Among ablated patients, 82.8% had no evidence of disease (NED), 12% had an indeterminate response (IR) and 5% a biochemical incomplete response (BIR). Non-ablated patients had NED in 90%, IR in 8.7% and BIR in 1.2%. No statistical difference was found between groups (p=0.29). No patient had evidence of structural disease at the end of follow-up. Conclusions:our findings support the recommendation against routine RA in low-risk DTC patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3