The Optimal Surgery Timing After Stenting in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Malignant Obstruction: Additionally Compared with Emergency Surgery

Author:

Na Ji Eun1,Kim Eun Ran2,Kim Ji Eun2,Hong Sung Noh2,Kim Young-Ho2,Chang Dong Kyung2

Affiliation:

1. Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital

2. Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aim The optimal surgery timing after stenting remains unclear in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with malignant obstruction. The objective of this study was to compare short-term and long-term outcomes according to the time interval after stenting. These outcomes were also compared with those of emergency surgery (ES). Patients and methods CRC patients with malignant obstruction who had obstructive symptoms between January 2008 and July 2018 were reviewed retrospectively, including 133 patients who visited the emergency room and subsequently underwent ES and 220 patients initially treated with stenting who subsequently underwent elective surgery. The time interval between self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement and elective surgery was classified as < 11 days, 11–17 days, and > 17 days. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. Results For those who received SEMS, the group with time interval of 11–17 days had fewer hospital days than the group with time interval < 11 days and the proportion of stoma formation was lower than that in the group with time interval of > 17 days. Multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of death only in the group with time interval of 11–17 days compared to the ES group (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24–0.97). Disease-free survival was comparable between time interval groups and the ES group (log-rank P = 0.52). Conclusions Approximately two weeks of the time interval after stenting to the elective surgery was reasonable.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020;Hooft JE;Endoscopy,2020

2. Is bridge to surgery stenting a safe alternative to emergency surgery in malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials;Foo CC;Surg Endosc,2019

3. The Role of Stents as Bridge to Surgery for Acute Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials;Yang P;Rev Invest Clin,2018

4. Endoscopic Stenting as Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Resection for Left-Sided Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: An Updated Meta-Analysis;Allievi N;Int J Surg Oncol,2017

5. Preoperative colonic stents versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis;Huang X;J Gastrointest Surg,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3