“Starting to think that way from the start": Approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.

Author:

Robinson-Barella Anna1,Richardson Charlotte Lucy1,Bayley Zana1,Husband Andy1,Bojke Andy2,Bojke Rona2,Exley Catherine3,Hanratty Barbara3,Elverson Joanna4,Jansen Jesse5,Todd Adam1

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University

2. Patient and Public Involvement, Newcastle University

3. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University

4. St Oswald's Hospice, Newcastle

5. Maastricht University

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Deprescribing has been defined as the planned process of reducing or stopping medications that may no longer be beneficial or are causing harm, with the goal of reducing medication burden while improving patient quality of life. At present, little is known about the specific challenges of decision-making to support deprescribing for patients who are accessing palliative care. By exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals, this qualitative study aimed to address this gap, and explore the challenges of, and potential solutions to, making decisions about deprescribing in a palliative care context. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals in-person or via video call, between August – January 2023. Perspectives on approaches to deprescribing in palliative care; when and how they might deprescribe; and the role of carers and family members within this were discussed. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis enabled the development of themes. QSR NVivo (Version 12) facilitated data management. Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394). Results: Twenty healthcare professionals were interviewed, including: medical consultants, nurses, specialist pharmacists, and general practitioners (GPs). Participants described the importance of deprescribing decision-making, and that it should be a considered, proactive, and planned process. Three themes were developed from the data, which centred on: (1) professional attitudes, competency and responsibility towards deprescribing; (2) changing the culture of deprescribing; and (3) involving the patient and family/caregivers in deprescribing decision-making. Conclusions: This study sought to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals with responsibility for making deprescribing decisions with people accessing palliative care services. A range of healthcare professionals identified the importance of supporting decision-making in deprescribing, so it becomes a proactive process within a patient’s care journey, rather than a reactive consequence. Future work should explore how healthcare professionals, patients and their family can best be supported in the shared decision-making processes of deprescribing. Trial registration: Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. Scott S. Deprescribing: a call for research that supports implementation in practice. In. Vol 29: Oxford University Press UK; 2021:525–526.

2. Clinical practice guidelines for older people with multimorbidity and life-limiting illness: what are the implications for deprescribing?;Okeowo D;Therapeutic Adv drug Saf,2018

3. A systematic review on methods for developing and validating deprescribing tools for older adults with limited life expectancy;Shrestha S;Int J Pharm Pract,2023

4. A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice;Reeve E;Br J Clin Pharmacol,2015

5. Organization WH. Medication safety in polypharmacy: technical report. World Health Organization;2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3