Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice – A prospective interventional study with follow-up

Author:

Afshar Kambiz1,Baal Katharina van1,Wiese Birgitt1,Schleef Tanja1,Stiel Stephanie1,Müller-Mundt Gabriele1,Schneider Nils1

Affiliation:

1. Hannover Medical School

Abstract

Abstract Background General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of primary palliative care (PC). The identification of patients who might benefit from PC and the timely initiation of patient-centred measures at the end of life are essential, yet challenging. Although different tools exist to support these key tasks, a structured approach is often missing. Objective The study aimed at implementing the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practices, following a structured and regional approach, in order to evaluate the effects of this tool on the identification of patients with potential PC needs and the initiation of patient-centred measures. Methods The intervention of this mixed-methods study comprised a standardised training of 52 GPs from 34 general practices in two counties in Lower Saxony, Germany, on the use of the SPICT-DE™. Subsequently, over a period of 12 months, GPs applied the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice with adult patients with chronic, progressive diseases, and completed a follow-up survey 6 months after the initial patient assessment. The outcome parameters were alterations in the patient’s situation, and the type and number of initiated patient-centred measures during the follow-up interval. Additionally, 12 months after the standardised training, GPs provided feedback on their application of the SPICT-DE™. Results A total of 43 GPs (n = 15 female, median age 53 years) out of an initial sample of 52 trained GPs assessed 580 patients (345 female, median age 84 years) with mainly cardiovascular (47%) and oncological (33%) diseases. Follow-up of 412 patients revealed that 231 (56%) experienced at least one critical incident in their disease progression (e.g. acute crisis), 151 (37%) had at least one hospital admission, and 141 (34%) died. A review of current treatment/medication (76%) and a clarification of treatment goals (53%) were the most frequently initiated patient-centred measures. The majority of GPs deemed the SPICT-DE™ practical (85%) and stated an intention to continue applying the tool in daily practice (66%). Conclusions The SPICT-DE™ is a practical tool that supports the identification of patients at risk of deterioration or dying and promotes the initiation of patient-centred measures. Trial registration The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (N° DRKS00015108; 22/01/2019).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference57 articles.

1. Radbruch L, Andersohn F, Walker J. Faktencheck Gesundheit – Palliativversorgung Modul 3: Überversorgung kurativ – Unterversorgung palliativ? Analyse ausgewählter Behandlungen am Lebensende. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2015. Available from: https://faktencheck-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_VV__FCG_Ueber-Unterversorgung-palliativ.pdf. Last access: 01 Aug 2022.

2. Melching H. Faktencheck Gesundheit – Palliativversorgung Modul 2: Strukturen und regionale Unterschiede in der Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2015. Available from: https://faktencheck-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_VV__FCG_Versorgungsstrukturen-palliativ.pdf. Last access: 01 Aug 2022.

3. The size of the population potentially in need of palliative care in Germany–an estimation based on death registration data;Scholten N;BMC Palliat Care,2016

4. Estimating the need for palliative care at the population level: A cross-national study in 12 countries;Morin L;Palliat Med,2017

5. How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates;Murtagh FE;Palliat Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3