Affiliation:
1. Hannover Medical School
Abstract
Abstract
Background
General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of primary palliative care (PC). The identification of patients who might benefit from PC and the timely initiation of patient-centred measures at the end of life are essential, yet challenging. Although different tools exist to support these key tasks, a structured approach is often missing.
Objective
The study aimed at implementing the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practices, following a structured and regional approach, in order to evaluate the effects of this tool on the identification of patients with potential PC needs and the initiation of patient-centred measures.
Methods
The intervention of this mixed-methods study comprised a standardised training of 52 GPs from 34 general practices in two counties in Lower Saxony, Germany, on the use of the SPICT-DE™. Subsequently, over a period of 12 months, GPs applied the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice with adult patients with chronic, progressive diseases, and completed a follow-up survey 6 months after the initial patient assessment. The outcome parameters were alterations in the patient’s situation, and the type and number of initiated patient-centred measures during the follow-up interval. Additionally, 12 months after the standardised training, GPs provided feedback on their application of the SPICT-DE™.
Results
A total of 43 GPs (n = 15 female, median age 53 years) out of an initial sample of 52 trained GPs assessed 580 patients (345 female, median age 84 years) with mainly cardiovascular (47%) and oncological (33%) diseases. Follow-up of 412 patients revealed that 231 (56%) experienced at least one critical incident in their disease progression (e.g. acute crisis), 151 (37%) had at least one hospital admission, and 141 (34%) died. A review of current treatment/medication (76%) and a clarification of treatment goals (53%) were the most frequently initiated patient-centred measures. The majority of GPs deemed the SPICT-DE™ practical (85%) and stated an intention to continue applying the tool in daily practice (66%).
Conclusions
The SPICT-DE™ is a practical tool that supports the identification of patients at risk of deterioration or dying and promotes the initiation of patient-centred measures.
Trial registration
The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (N° DRKS00015108; 22/01/2019).
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Radbruch L, Andersohn F, Walker J. Faktencheck Gesundheit – Palliativversorgung Modul 3: Überversorgung kurativ – Unterversorgung palliativ? Analyse ausgewählter Behandlungen am Lebensende. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2015. Available from: https://faktencheck-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_VV__FCG_Ueber-Unterversorgung-palliativ.pdf. Last access: 01 Aug 2022.
2. Melching H. Faktencheck Gesundheit – Palliativversorgung Modul 2: Strukturen und regionale Unterschiede in der Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2015. Available from: https://faktencheck-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_VV__FCG_Versorgungsstrukturen-palliativ.pdf. Last access: 01 Aug 2022.
3. The size of the population potentially in need of palliative care in Germany–an estimation based on death registration data;Scholten N;BMC Palliat Care,2016
4. Estimating the need for palliative care at the population level: A cross-national study in 12 countries;Morin L;Palliat Med,2017
5. How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates;Murtagh FE;Palliat Med,2014