Grassroots democracy: the impact of asking learners what they want to know on attendance and learning

Author:

Segon Ankur1,Sharma-Segon Yogita2

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

2. San Antonio, Audie Murphy VA

Abstract

Abstract Background: The General Internal Medicine Acting Internship (GIM AI) at our school is a compulsory, month long experience. Core teaching sessions are conducted on a weekly basis as part of the acting internship and were poorly attended. Objective: We sought to redesign our academic half day didactic curriculum and increase voluntary student attendance by allowing students to actively participate in determining the content of the acting internship academic half day. Intervention: Prior to the beginning of the acting internship, students were sent an email survey listing seven inpatient topics to rank on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=not at all interested, 5=very interested). Based upon student feedback, one additional topic was added: antibiotic use for common inpatient diagnoses. A total of 32 sessions were conducted over 8 months. Student attendance at these sessions was voluntary. Dates were randomized between "case-based sessions" (control) and "topic-based sessions". Topics that received the highest score were selected for topic-based sessions. Main measures: Student attendance at topic-based sessions versus case-based sessions Key results: Case based discussions had the lowest preference ranking (N 94, mean 2.9), while cross cover-based discussions (N 94, mean 4.3, p 0.001) and antibiotic use (N 52, mean 4.3, p 0.001) received the highest scores. 34% of possible learners attended case-based discussions, while 78% of possible learners attended topic-based sessions (p<0.001). Learners reported a statistically significant improvement in comfort level with recognizing or managing 74% of the sub-topics discussed (31 out of 42) Conclusions: A learner centered approach to curriculum design led to robust student engagement in our acting internship academic half day. Fourth year students prefer specific topic-based teaching sessions over case based, morning report style sessions. Learner preferences around content areas that were generated at our school can inform similar efforts at other institutions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3