Comparison in radiographic outcomes between robotic-assisted cruciate- retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study

Author:

Huang Zhenchao1,Zhang Zian1,Yu Chaoqun1,Wang Wenzhe1,Zhang Haining1

Affiliation:

1. the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Abstract

Abstract Background Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is currently increasingly used in the field of joint arthroplasty, with cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses currently being the most widely used prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in radiographic outcomes and early clinical outcomes between CR and PS in RA-TKA. Methods This prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 120 patients who underwent primary CR or PS RA-TKA between July 2022 and March 2023. Knee radiographs were taken one-day postoperative, while range of motion (ROM) and clinical scores were recorded in the outpatient clinic six-month postoperative. Radiographic outcomes and early clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared, respectively. Results Patients implanted with PS achieved a lower postoperative PTS (P < 0.001), as well as a higher ΔFTA (P = 0.001), ΔHKA (P < 0.001) and absolute ΔPTS (P < 0.001) compared to patients with CR RA-TKA. All radiographic parameters in both groups were changed significantly after surgery (P < 0.001). No difference was found in Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) or 5-point Likert Score. However, postoperative ROM (P = 0.034) and ΔROM (P = 0.012) was significantly higher in CR than in PS group. Conclusion Patients with PS can achieve a lower postoperative PTS, and a higher ΔFTA, ΔHKA and absolute ΔPTS compared to patients with CR RA-TKA. Postoperative ROM and ΔROM were higher in CR than in PS group. However, the significant difference in radiographic outcomes and ROM did not translate into any difference in clinical outcomes. No difference was found in FJS-12 or 5-point Likert Score.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3