On the Building of Each Psychologist`s Approach

Author:

Abumanssur Mateus Elias1,Simão Livia Mathias1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract Psychology is divided in different systems, each a tradition with its own postulates, assumptions, methodology, themes and ethics. This division, not being purely theoretical, is built into the institutionalisation of psychology, shaping career paths and identities within this field. For the individual psychologist, positioning herself in relation to those dividing lines is a practical imposition. But the experience of what those divisions are, what they represent, and how such choices are made, varies greatly from one psychologist to another, and we are not fully self-conscious of the process. In this research, developed in the framework of semiotic cultural constructivism, we interviewed two acting psychologists on their own experiences, and, through the dialogue with what they and other authors brought, propose a few processes and dimensions to conceptualise our qualitative understanding of how psychologists build their own theoretical positioning within psychology, as a process that happens both in individual and collective dimensions. Finally, we bring considerations on what our standpoint implicates for the learning, the institutionalisation and the theoretical negotiation of psychology.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). Thesocialconstructionofreality:Atreatiseinthesociologyofknowledge.Anchor.

2. Entrevistas com profissionais como atividade de ensino-aprendizagem desejável na formação do psicólogo;Bettoi W;Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica,2002

3. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Choses dites. Paris: Editions de minuit.

4. Psytizens”: The co-construction of the professional identity of psychology students in the postmodern world;Castro-Tejerina J;Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,2014

5. Learning psychology and becoming psychologists: Developing professional identity through group experiential learning;Falgares G;Psychology Learning & Teaching,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3