Is anterior fusion still necessary in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Grin Andrey1ORCID,Karanadze Vasiliy1ORCID,Lvov Ivan1ORCID,Kordonskiy Anton1ORCID,Talypov Aleksandr1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of anterior, combined approaches, and short-segment pedicle screw fixation (PSF) without fusion in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBF). Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Inclusion criteria comprised articles published between 2004 and 2023, full-text availability in English, burst fractures without spinal cord or nerve root injuries at admission, short-segment PSF without fusion, anterior or combined fusion methods, patients aged 18 or older, and a minimum 12-month follow-up. Meta-analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Using a single-arm meta-analysis method, pooled indicators of short- and long-term outcomes for each studied group were determined. The obtained data were then compared using simple comparison. Results: The pooled mean Cobb angle at admission for the anterior, combined, and PSF groups was 14.2° (95% CI, 9.7–18.7), 13.2° (95% CI, 10.8–15.7), and 17.1° (95% CI, 15.1–19.1), respectively. Surgery achieved similar levels of kyphosis correction across all groups, but only the PSF group experienced significant correction loss after discharge (SMD = -0.582 [95% CI, -0.810, -0.354]), amounting to 3.7°. The anterior vertebral body compression rate at admission was 54.4% (95% CI, 45.7-63.0) in the combined group and 37.8% (95% CI, 33.7-41.9) in the PSF group. Operative time, blood loss, and hospitalization duration were lowest in the percutaneous PSF group, with means of 96.5 minutes (95% CI, 82.4–110.6), 83.8 ml (95% CI, 71.7–95.9), and 6.6 days (95% CI, 4.7–8.5), respectively. The anterior approach showed a lower incidence of deep wound infections and implant-related complications. The pooled complication rates or the combined and PSF groups were 6.5% (95% CI, 2.7–14.5) and 5.6% (95% CI, 4.3–7.3), respectively. The pooled Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were 17.6 (95% CI, 11.8–23.3) for the anterior group, 15.4 (95% CI, 11.5–19.3) for the combined group, and 13.4 (95% CI, 10.4–16.3) for the PSF group. Conclusions: For patients with neurologically intact TLBF with a kyphotic angle of less than 19.10 and an anterior vertebral body compression rate of less than 41.9%, anterior fusion can be avoided in favor of short-segment PSF without fusion. When determining the surgical approach, the surgeon should weigh the moderate advantage of anterior fusion in maintaining postoperative correction of kyphotic deformity against its significantly greater surgical trauma. Anterior and combined fusion have not demonstrated advantages over the posterior approach in the ODI during long-term outcomes assessment.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3